Copyright © 2021

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Putin regime – West’s ‘existential’ enemy and West must stop his aggression in Ukraine by force, Skobov says

Russian state crest in front of full moon (Image:
Putin regime – West’s ‘existential’ enemy and West must stop his aggression in Ukraine by force, Skobov says
Edited by: A. N.

The regime Vladimir Putin has created in Russia is an “existential” enemy of the West and an international system intended to limit the use of violence by one state against others, Aleksandr Skobov says. His aggression against Ukraine is thus far more than an attack on that country: it is an attack on the West as such.

Aleksandr Skobov (Image:
Aleksandr Skobov

Many Western leaders do not want to acknowledge this, the Russian commentator says, because it would require them to act; but their failure to understand what Putin is about and why will not solve the problem but only guarantee that it will fester and become an ever greater threat to Western civilization.

According to Skobov, “the most important aspect of humanity’s progress is the constant reduction in the level of force and cruelty in social relations,” progress that Western civilization has played the key role in promoting. But “despite the progress that has been achieved, today, the world is confronted by a most serious crisis.”

There are “objective reasons” for this crisis, Skobov says. The world is changing as a result of globalization and the shift to post-industrial societies, changes that have caused real problems for many countries. The leaders of the West bear some responsibility for this crisis, he continues. But the largest responsibility lies elsewhere.

It lies with “reactionary forces who consider limitations achieved by Western civilization on the right to use force excessive” and who seek to throw off any restrictions on their own actions. They back the idea of “everyone for himself,” and they oppose this to the principle of “’human rights for all’” both within their own countries and internationally.

“The Putin regime in Russia has become the shock detachment of the forces of worldwide reaction,” Skobov argues. It has transformed into the reason for its existence the struggle with the leadership of the West in the world and with the spread of Western principles and values.”

And this, Skobov insists, “is hardly an accident or a historical misunderstanding.”

Because of its criminal nature and habits of mind, the commentator continues, “the new Russian ‘elite’ has given rise to a unique political regime, one often called ‘a mafia.’” It is a regime that allows its members access to unlimited wealth, one based on deception and force, and one unrestrained by any law.

“The very existence of a more developed, successful, and attractive social system, in which the dominating elites after a long struggle have come to terms with their responsibility to society and with legal limitations on force is something the ruling kleptocracy of the Putin mafia views as a threat,” Skobov says.

At its base, he continues, the roots of the Putin regime’s hatred to Western civilization and its political values” take as their point of departure the radical conservatism of the 19th century with its attacks on liberal values,” which rejected the French revolution of 1789 and ultimately led to what Hitler called national socialism.

Because that is the case, Skobov continues, the Putin kleptocracy is “the ‘existential’ enemy of Western civilization and its way of life. The Putin mafia not only seeks with all its strengths to stop the spread of the Western political model … it strikes to destroy Western civilization from within by corrupting elites and supporting reactionary extreme right forces.”

The Putin regime can justify its internal order only by seeking to recover “a zone of imperial diktat, the possibility to rape and dismember its neighbors” without punishment. And in this way it can provide support for itself by “destroying the very principle of the supremacy of international law.

Consequently, “the imperial revanchism of the Putin kleptocracy must not be considered as an exclusively pragmatic instrument for the achievement of domestic political goals.” It reflects a desire for greatness based on the destruction of the West and the West’s values, Skobov says.

Because it possesses nuclear weapons and says it is prepared to use them, the Putin mafia has become “the main threat today to peace, progress and civilization.“ It has committed war crimes and crimes against humanity for the entire period of its existence, starting with the “colonial Chechen wars” and now involving the attack on Ukraine.

“Putin is not simply a thief and a kleptocrat,” Skobov continues. “He is a mass murderer and a fanatic. Death and war accompany all his rule. Putin is death and war. Putin is the aggressor. No one threatens Russia with conquest and enslavement. Putin conducts his wars for the enslavement of others.”

In order to enslave others, “Putin has unleashed an aggressive war against Ukraine” and annexed Crimea. And as a result, “Ukraine has become the main field of battle in the global fight between the Putin mafia and Western civilization.”
That is where the fate of the current international legal order will be decided.

That order will survive “only if the world has sufficient political will and decisiveness to force the Russian Federation to get out of Crimea and the Donbas. Therefore, any actions directed at forcing Russia to leave these places must be welcomed.”

Unfortunately for the West, “stopping Putin’s aggression only by sanctions targeted at his entourage is impossible. “As long as the countries of the West refuse to use arms against the aggression, Putin will successfully destroy the international legal order through his use of ‘hybrid wars.’”

“Sometimes one must fight for peace,” Skobov says, or as Andrey Illarionov put it in a recent interview, “tanks will only be stopped by other tanks – or by tank-stopping means.”

And Skobov concludes: “While the war is going on, any expression of support and sympathy for the Putin army is a betrayal of the victims of aggression” and an act of assistance to “the occupiers and those who would inflict punishment on our common worldwide home.”

Thus, “don’t believe Putin: he isn’t racing to get into paradise: he supposes that in this earth, he awaits not paradise but the Beslan school with burning walls falling on those within.”

Further Reading:

Edited by: A. N.
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here