Before Helsinki, the London-based analyst says, he thought the chances of impeachment were “no more than 20 percent.” Now, they may be as high as 40 given that Americans are now talking about Trump’s behavior as treasonous, something that few were doing only two weeks ago. “Trump also understands this,” Pastukhov says; and it is for this reason that he wants to invite Putin for meeting in November” when “he will prepare himself as a genuine realtor for revenge. I therefore am not certain that Putin will or should go there because obviously that is what Trump wants.” Trump needs to take revenge before the midterm elections and upstaging Putin would be just the way to do that. In the absence of such a second summit, the president’s party could lose big in that voting and Trump could face a Congress far more ready to impeach him than is the current one.That in turn means that Putin’s “strategic goal” is not to have “his own man in Washington” but rather to take steps directed at “the weakening of America.” Thus, Pastukhov says, “Putin perhaps consciously and perhaps unconsciously via this meeting in essence pushed Trump toward impeachment.”
And as a result, the Kremlin leader “considers that Russia has one goal – to disorganize the West to the maximum degree possible” so that Russia can build up its strength. “By disorganizing America, he is weakening Trump and forcing him to constantly twist and turn,” thus preventing Washington from having any consistent and consolidated policy. Moreover, Putin understands better than almost anyone else the power of bluff. He knows that the USSR collapsed because Ronald Reagan talked about a Star Wars system he did not yet have in order to force the Soviet leaders to spend money they did not have so as to be able to counter it.Putin has undergone “many stages of evolution” in his views about the world and how to deal with it.” Now, he has concluded that “a third world war is practically inevitable and that it is impossible to reach an agreement with the West.” Earlier, he didn’t believe in legal agreements. After he broke the foundations of the post-World War II world order by annexing Crimea in 2014, “he didn’t believe in understandings” either.
Putin’s strength, the historian says, is that he thinks in longer term ways than do his opponents and that he is “the heir of a great empire,” one that can be described as a “unique” one because of the enormous resources under its control and that will seek its revenge in a massive way. According to Pastukhov, “the West committed a colossal mistake in the 1990s and early 2000s when it gave the impression that this problem does not exist. It exists and how! And Putin is the heir of all this.” But in addition to that background, Putin has another source of strength that must be acknowledged. Unlike many others, he really is a leader “who has been able to group around himself an elite and transform it into a real pack.” As long as he has the resources and this support group, he will remain a dangerous player with whom no one will be able to reach a serious agreement except on his terms.“Today, it seems to me,” Pastukhov continues, “that the Kremlin has brilliantly after a quarter of a century adopted this same tactic,” using bluffs about “hyper-sonic wars and all the rest” against America. That is, he is creating a certain appearance of strength which in reality does not exist.” But that makes others nervous and ensures they commit errors.
Read More:
- Trump has done more than collude with Putin: he’s helped Kremlin leader destroy post-1945 world
- To rule Russia, Putin doesn’t need mass murders: he has TV, Khersonsky says
- Putin and Trump aren’t conservatives: they’re reactionaries, Golts says
- Three pieces of very bad economic news for Putin
- Stalin frequently modified Russia’s borders, adding and subtracting territory, Butakov says
- Russia is preparing a “loyal opposition”
- Kremlin-linked Russian commentators step up calls for ‘destruction’ of Ukraine
- Trump’s summit with Putin constitutes an ‘unprecedented act of betrayal,’ Eidman says