
This involves such things as theft, violence, murders, divorce and general criminality, factors that reflect how people really feel about developments in contrast to what they say. In Russia in the 1990s and East Germany at the time of reunification, people said they were pleased by the development. The same is true in Crimea, he reports. But their actions, which reflect their “subconscious” feelings, point in a different direction and do have demographic consequences. Unfortunately, the link between subconscious feelings and demography and the impact of cognitive dissonance between conscious and unconscious feelings are “typically ignored by sociologists.”According to Gundarov, “contemporary medicine isn’t capable of explaining the cause of super-high mortality in Crimea,” but events in Russia in the 1990s and in the GDR at the time of reunification point to a possible explanation, the impact on geography of “a deformed public consciousness.”

Consequently, the GDR syndrome is likely to last far longer than it did in Germany.All these factors taken together have depressed the birthrate and produced what can only be called “a humanitarian catastrophe,” the product the medical scholar says of “the GDR syndrome” there. What is especially unfortunate, he continues, is that the methods the authorities there are using to address this are not going to work.
Related:
- Chronology of the annexation of Crimea
- The Crimean Anschluss at three: ‘A jubilee of stupidity and criminality’
- Hitler’s anschluss and Putin’s: Similarities and differences
- “See you in the Hague!” Last word of Crimean Tatar leader Umerov on Russian show trial
- UN report condemns Russia over human rights abuses in occupied Crimea
- “It’s Russia which broke the law” – last word of Crimean journalist prosecuted for opposing illegal landgrab
- Russia putting historic Crimean landmarks in danger
- Another “terrorist”? Russian FSB kidnaps, tortures Crimean Tatar to obtain false “confession”
 
			
 
				 
						 
						 
						