The commentator points out that “the overwhelming majority of European revolutions of contemporary times, including [Russia’s] in 1991” did not lead to civil war,” and consequently, those who suggest that any future overturning of the Russian regime will have that outcome are frightening people in ways that help keep the regime in power.The Kremlin’s “adventurist policy will inevitably lead to new military conflicts,” Eidman says. “The very existence of this aggressive and inadequate regime, with its atomic weapons, sharply increases the risk of global war and nuclear catastrophe.” And thus the continued existence of Putin’s regime threatens people far more than any revolution.
And he continues: “Only a revolution can liquidate the Putin regime, the currently most dangerous source of threats of a global catastrophe.” And thus a revolution and not anything is “is the single chance for people striving to ensure that their families have a secure future.”“Unfortunately, there is no fairytale figure who could lead out of the Kremlin the enormous army of rats in uniform who have settled there, headed by a kind who long ago lost his adequacy” to rule. “They won’t go by themselves,” Eidman says, “and to hope for that is to deceive oneself and those around us.”
Related:
- Putin has never grown out of childish belief that force is enough, Yakovenko says
- Russians needn’t fear West’s sanctions but should worry about Moscow’s response, Shelin says
- ‘Is Putin a CIA agent or only the richest man on Earth?’ and other neglected Russian stories
- Shmulyevich: Putin to reprise Stalin’s Winter War in Finland strategy against Ukraine
- Gontmakher: ‘Putin’s system could fall apart in a single day,’ like the tsarist one a century ago
- Money is not always the answer. What do we know about latest cyber attack on Ukraine
- Russia will continue efforts to destabilize Montenegro, expert says
- Russia joins Iran and North Korea on US ‘axis of evil’ list, Kommersant says
