Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Pots, tours and clothing stamps: what is used to bribe the voters

Pots, tours and clothing stamps: what is used to bribe the voters
Article by: Marichka Naboka
Translated by: Mariya Shcherbinina
Kyiv – Lower prices on cooking pots, half a thousand hryvnia for sharing one issue of a party newspaper, discounts on camouflage clothing and free excursions. Any sort of means are used to bribe the voters. Meanwhile civil network Opora has documented fewer instances of bribery and usage of administrative resources than in 2012. The parties that are accused of violating electoral legislation promise to verify the information. 

The intensity of bribery and usage of administrative resources on part of the candidates and parties for the early parliamentary elections is smaller than at the 2012 elections. Meanwhile the facts documented by civil network Opora testify to the fact that most candidates are ready to win by unfair means, says the organization’s analyst Oleksandr Kliuzhev. 

“The violations are less systematic and less organized than in 2012. This has to do first and foremost with the fact that the candidates, first and foremost the self-nominated ones, do not use goods, services, other material values bought using state or local funds, which was a mass occurrence in 2012. Back then the candidates from the ruling party handed out digital receivers for television, medicine purchased using the state or local budget funds. Now they use their own resources,” Kliuzhev noted.

Self-nominees bribe the most

As of October 15, Opora has documented 63 incidents with the characteristics of voter bribery, which includes providing them with goods, services, money. Under the guise of charity they are given medicine, equipment and even taken on free excursions. Besides, the people are being bribed with cheap cooking pots and coupons for the shop Camouflage.

Opora names a good example of pre-electoral manipulation: a 500 hryvnia reward for spreading just one issue of a propaganda newspaper.

44 instances (almost 70% of the violations) that deal with voter bribery corresponded with the activities of self-nominated candidates. Candidates from Petro Poroshenko’s Block take second place (6 instances), they resort to bribery disguised as charity at the majority district voting. One instance was documented in Opposition Block. However, the self-nominees include current members of the Parliament who belonged to the Party of Regions, which formally does not participate in this campaign,” says Opora electoral programs coordinator Olga Ayvazovska.

Former Chairman of the Voters’ Committee of Ukraine, currently candidate from Petro Poroshenko’s Block Oleksandr Chernenko told Radio Liberty that the party will definitely react to such information by verifying it.

“We have many candidates, and we do not exclude the possibility that this may be a provocation on part of the competition. Our party declares maximally honest and democratic elections and is trying to stick to these declarations to the maximum. Possible some candidates did not fully comprehend the responsibility they have, or maybe it is a provocation on part of the competition,” noted Chernenko.

On October 14 the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine approved the amendments regarding the increase of responsibility for committing crimes which violate the citizen’s voting rights. Now the law establishes criminal responsibility not only for those who bribe but also those who receive illicit benefits from voting. Meanwhile the decision of the Parliament was approved at the end of the electoral campaign, experts note. Which allows the candidates to avoid responsibility for the violations they have already committed. Civil network Opora insists that the President of Ukraine immediately sign the amendments to the Ukrainian Criminal Code with the goal of preventing violations in the last days of the electoral campaign, on poll day, the vote count and the determination of the results of the voting.

Translated by: Mariya Shcherbinina
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts