Anti-Terrorist operation: Summary for August 7, 2014

Anti-Terrorist operation: Summary for August 7, 2014


By Roman Burko

Terrorists continue to build up their forces in Snizhne, Luhansk, Alchevsk, Stakhanov and Donetsk. The build up of armored vehicles, namely, tanks indicates an accumulation of the attack forces outside the city limits. The First Chechen War showed Russia that the use of tanks in a city is not effective.

In the near future we can expect attacks against the Ukrainian forces in the area of Dmytrivka and Marynivka. The attack itself will be from the area of Zalisne (located between Snizhne and Miusynsk). The attack is likely to be aimed at the Snizhne – Manuilivka – Petrovske – Donetskyi Kriazh – Marynivka. And if “by accident” there are some groupings of Armed Forces of Ukraine in that area, the situation will be similar to the incident in Chervonopartyzansk. We have repeatedly pointed out about the need to destroy transportation links used by the terrorists. It is necessary to demolish all bridges over the Horikhova river in the area of Manuilivka in order to cut off reinforcements from Snizhne. It should be noted that the terrorists have up to 50 tanks in Snizhne. The terrain in that area is difficult to traverse, there are many rivers; all these are enough to create a barrier against heavy armored vehicles. However, this is only of current importance if the enemy still has not settled in the Donetskyi Kriazh Reserve. Judging by the fact that the Ukrainian forces had to withdraw from the top of Savur-Mohyla, it is most likely that the terrorists have already settled down there. [By the way, this night (7th) an attack in one of the directions we had written about began].

Donetsk

As for Donetsk the artillery duels continue. The Ukrainian forces try to hit terrorist targets located far away from the residential areas. The terrorists in response to the Ukrainian forces shell residential areas as well. Perhaps this is done on purpose so that during the next “briefing” no one has doubts as to the humanitarian catastrophe in the region.

The terrorists continue to accumulate their forces in the Mariupol direction that is where the possibility of a counter-attack towards the sea remains quite high. The only good news is that the Ukrainian forces do not try to enter the city from the direction of Marinka anymore. Perhaps they started to regroup towards more threatened directions.

Ukrainian forces are not very active in the north of Donetsk. It really does not make sense to continue the attack on Yasynuvata and further stretching into a narrow corridor between Horlivka and Donetsk until the problem with Makiivka and Khartsyzk is solved. The reason is that the terrorists could easily thrust forward, cutting off the attack group in that corridor. We are now waiting until the command is ready for an attack from Debeltseve towards Yenakiyeve and then further towards Makiivka. The terrorists are most likely waiting for the same judging by the fact that the artillery in the morning began to work from Donetsk toward Makiivka.  They are either zeroing in their artillery for the future, or are panicking and think that the Ukrainian forces are on the offensive there already.

Finally we should note that the composition of the terrorists has changed, residents say they see new characters in the streets.

Horlivka

The situation with Horlivka is not that simple. A large number of field roads between Horlivka and nearby settlements enables terrorists forces to move secretly and attack by the Ukrainian Forces by surprise.

Pervomaisk / Stakhanov

Pervomaisk remains unassailable, terrorists constantly counter-attack toward Popasna. Such counterattacks draw off parts of the Ukrainian forces from other directions (for example, Shakhtarsk). Besides, the terrorists continue to accumulate their forces in Stakhanov. We wrote about headquarters reserves in our summary yesterday. The possibility of attack on Debaltseve from Brianka and Alchevsk (a fairly large grouping of terrorist forces is located there) remains high.

Luhansk

New reinforcements (both manpower and military equipment) have arrived here from the Russian town of Donetsk (Rostov region). The terrorists are resisting the Ukrainian forces advance from the northern direction and from time to time they also shell the Lutuhyne grouping of the Ukrainian forces. We have previously noted that the availability of road networks between Shchastia and Luhansk via Malynske forest can lead to encirclement of the forces advancing on Luhansk from the north. We do not deny that this idea looks quite daring but do not forget that the Ukrainian forces are waging war on irregular armed groups whose tactics are often unexpected maneuvers. Taking into account the terrain on the right bank of the river Donets, we can expect surgical strikes aimed at the rear of the attacking Ukrainian forces.

A Concluding Comment

We are often asked why we so rarely please our readers with good news, and why our forecasts are always quite skeptical. We believe that while the war is going on in the East and most of Ukraine still does not feel the full responsibility for the future and the freedom of Ukraine, it is inappropriate to dream about an imminent quick victory. Instead, it is high time to finally realize that we are waging war not against a bunch of a rabble terrorizing the cities in the East but with specially trained mercenaries who are supplied with weapons, equipment and reinforcements from the Russian Federation. The fine line between the full-scale invasion and constant reinforcements almost vanishes. Does it make any difference if the terrorist firing at you has a military card proving that they serve in the Armed Forces of Russia or not? The result is the same, our freedom and independence are encroached upon and we must respond to this encroachment with lightning speed, and directly, by mobilizing all efforts. The stake in this war is much higher than just life, the stake is the future of our children.

[hr]Source: burkonews.info, edited by Larry Field, edited by Myron Spolsky

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Leave a Reply
    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts

    February 12: ”Normandy Four” negotiations concluded in Minsk with a disappointing result for Ukraine

    February 12 – "Normandy Four" negotiations concluded in Minsk with a disappointing result for Ukraine. Putin did not give in on a single point – there will be no withdrawal of Russian troops (they are, of course, nowhere close to Ukraine), no immediate resumption of control over the border, no reinstatement of sovereignty over occupied Crimea or Donbas. There are, however, the obligations on behalf of Ukraine to service social needs of separatists, legalize their armed gangs and hold fake elections under their watchful eye. The situation looks a lot like the surrender of Sudetenland (Czechoslovakia) to Hitler.

    February 12 – Total financial assistance to Ukraine from the IMF and other organizations could amount to 40 billion dollars over 4 years, – said IMF's Managing Director Christine Lagarde.

    February 12 – Russian Ministry for Emergency Situations has announced the preparations for the 14th so-called humanitarian aid convoy destined for Donbas – more weapons will be transported, no doubt.

    February 12 – Russia has transferred another lot of military equipment and artillery to the territory of Ukraine, controlled by militants – approximately 50 tanks, 40 "Grad", "Uragan" and "Smerch" multiple rocket launch systems and 40 armored vehicles crossed Russian-Ukrainian border at border crossing point Izvaryne, – said NSDC spokesman Andriy Lysenko.

    February 12 – The transfer of the amphibious assault ship "Vladivostok" (Mistral-class) to Russia could begin as early as next week.

    February 12 – EU High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy Federica Mogherini does not expect sanctions against Russia to be discussed during the summit of EU member-states leaders to be held on Thursday.

    February 12 – Secretary General of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Lamberto Zannier hassaid that at present it is impossible to determine whether the militants in Donbas are also soldiers of the regular Russian army. OSCE has completely exhausted itself as a security-oriented organization.

    February 12 – Agreements reached in Minsk during the meeting of the leaders of the countries of the "Normandy quartet" are absolutely weak. This was stated by the President of Lithuania, Dalia Grybaskaite, to journalists in Brussels before the EU Summit. "The fundamental part of the resolution is the control of the borders. It was not agreed upon and not resolved," she noted. "This means that the border is open for crossing by whatever soldiers and whatever artillery," remarked Grybaskaite. "This means that the resolution is totally weak," emphasized the President of Lithuania. She is also not very optimistic about the agreements on the cease-fire.

    "Five months ago we already had one agreement about a cease-fire which was not implemented. Let's see what happens with this one," underlined Grybaskaite. "We will observe in the next few days how at least these partial agreements will be implemented," she added.

    War is hell! (photo report from occupied Vuhlehirsk)

    Russia lies... great start to Minsk agreement (Savchenko cannot be released!!)

    Timothy Ash

    Ukraine – deal thoughts


    I guess with hindsight, a deal was always going to be done. Merkel was not going to get on a flight to Minsk, after Kyiv, Moscow, and Berlin, and not get something. And Putin needed to try and rebuild some bridges with Merkel, after seemingly upsetting her at Brisbane. Merkel is probably the honest broker in all this. She really feels for the Ukrainian position, but understands the real threat from Russia – she reads Putin better than any other Western leader, and cannot be bought. But it is Bismark-style real politik for Merkel, and she was desperate to stop the fighting – almost at any cost, which is entirely understandable. Hollande will likely get his aircraft carriers delivered, and sees all this as offering the hope of ressurection in terms of his presidency at home – a global leader, strutting the international stage and making Cameron, et al look like poodles, or rather a bulldog with no teeth. Putin gets his aircraft carriers, which will no doubt have a nice shiny berth now awaiting in Sebastopol. Putin also fended off near term threats of sanctions from the West, and can sell himself to allies in Europe (there are many) as a peacemaker – again heading off further sanctions threats. He has also not agreed to very much, as I don't think his signature is on the document, so if it fails (and it likely will) he can blame others. He has also headed off the threat of the US arming Ukraine – and therein he is in cahoots with Obama himself, who will see this deal as being useful in fending off calls from the DC consensus (including within his own administration) now to arm Ukraine – and can return to his own "splendid isolation" or "strategic patience" as it is now called stateside. That's a nice term for doing as little as possible. Poroshenko gets his IMF programme, and can try and roll out reforms attached to this to try and assure the supporters of Maydan that this team is really the Real Deal in terms of the reforms they so desire. Note the IMF press release was timed for 10am, just as news of the Minsk deal broke – so my sense is that someone was telling the Ukrainians that an IMF deal was contingent on a Minsk ceasefire deal. No ceasefire – no IMF deal. And the IMF gets to roll out its new programme, which it has been working on for months. Poroshenko probably also thinks that the ceasefire will buy time for Ukraine to regroup, rearm against the clear and present danger of further Russian intervention. But will it all stick/last? I just do not think so, as I still fail to see from this deal what is different to Minsk I in terms of delivery on Russian strategic objectives in Ukraine. Minsk I clearly did not deliver for Russia, hence that ceasefire did not last long, so let's see what is really different this time around. The issues of real autonomy/federalism, and border control don't appear to be properly addressed in this document. Constitutional reform towards the Russian agenda will be impossible for Poroshenko to deliver. And finally and fundamentally why I do not think that the status quo is sustainable – one year ago Russia felt the need to annex Crimea, and intervene in eastern Ukraine. But one year ago Ukraine was no threat to Russia as a) it was non aligned; b) popular support for Nato membership was low single digits, and there was little support in parliament or amongst political elites to drive Ukraine NATO membership. C) the west really did not want Ukraine in NATO as they saw this as a red rag to the Russian bull, and as events have proved could not defend Ukraine under NATO's TOR; c) the Ukrainian military had limited fighting capability as was proven in the early days of the conflict, but subsequently changed; d) the govt in Kyiv was weak and disarray and the Ukrainian economy on the brink of collapse; e) and as events have proven Russia had de facto control of Crimea via the stationing of 26,000 troops and the long term BSF agreement. And f) and finally Ukrainians were not anti-russian or even particularly anti-Putin. If Moscow was not a real threat a year ago, but Moscow felt compelled to intervene, look at the risk from a Russian perspective now from Ukraine – a) Ukraine is no longer non aligned. B) it now wants to join NATO and opinion polls now show majority support for this. C) Ukraine is rebuilding military capability and the military doctrine is now against the threat from Russia; d) Ukraine has a reform admin in Kyiv, which has a real chance of succeeding now with imf support. It can offer a rival and successful model of development to Putin's power vertical and sovereign democracy. E) Opinion polls show strong ukrainian opposition/distaste for the Putin regime. So, net-net the above still suggests the risk of further future Russian intervention in Ukraine.

    P.S.: Please spread this appeal as much as possible.

    Ads are disabled for Euromaidan patrons.

    Support us on Patreon for an ad-free experience.

    Already with us on Patreon?

    Enter the code you received on Patreon or by email to disable ads for 6 months

    Invalid code. Please try again

    Code successfully activated

    Ads will be hidden for 6 months.