In December 2018, the Lviv-based pollster SocioInform conducted a survey of a representative sample in all Ukrainian oblasts excluding occupied areas and the Museum presented its results. And here is what the study found.
Reasons for the Euromaidan protests
According to the poll results, more than one-third of all respondents (38%) believe the revolution was conditioned by attempt of the team of then president Viktor Yanukovych to usurp power. Some 28% believe that an economic downturn gave rise to the protests, another 28% regarded boosted corruption as the background for the revolution. Other reasons mentioned were strengthening of oligarchic powers (24%), a conflict between regions (23%), systematic violation of the civil rights and freedoms (23%), pro-Russian policies of the government (18%). Some 13% still see an effort of the Western countries to tighten their control over Ukraine as a precondition for Euromaidan.
The respondents believe that the immediate cause that brought people to the streets was the attack of the Berkut riot police on the peaceful protesters (55%) or the abrupt decision to end talks on a Ukraine-EU Association Agreement (47%) or the desire to topple Yanukovych and his team (35%). Some 21% of the surveyed still believe that people were paid for participation in the protests and it was the reason why the Euromaidan events started.
Three-fourths (74%) followed the developments of the Revolution of Dignity, and 32% followed them closely. Thus, Ukrainians were highly involved.
What was Euromaidan?
Among the key milestones of the Euromaidan protests are the 20 November 2013 violent crackdown on the students by the Berkut riot police (45%), the bloody shooting on Instytutska on 20 February 2014 (42%). Other top milestone Euromaidan events, according to the survey, were the first deaths of the protesters (37.3%), the flight of then-President Viktor Yanukovych (32.1%), “baptism by fire” at barricades on Hrushevskoho (31%).
What it was and how it worked
Every tenth respondent didn’t find the Euromaidan a significant event. However, most of the pollees considered it a nation-wide event (69%), since various ways of life supported it (66%).
Almost the same shares of poll participants believe that solidarity of different Ukrainian regions (64,1%) and wide popular support among Kyiv residents (66,6%) made the Revolution of Dignity possible.
The opinions on how the Maidan operated differ. More than half (60%) see the self-organization of the citizens behind it, while about a half (49%) believe that the opposition parties sponsored the tent camp and stage.
As for the conflict itself, over 50% sided with the protesters and volunteers. More than half of the respondents discountenanced the authorities and pro-government anti-Maidan protesters. The main adversary of the Euromaidan was Viktor Yanukovych and his closest allies, 71% of the pollees believe.
Some 16% of pollees took a direct part in the Maidan events with 51% of them in Kyiv, 54% in other city or village. 97% of then-participants took part on the Euromaidan side, 52% of them were average “maidaners,” 34,2% supported the protesters with foodstuffs, money etc.
The regional divide shows that no region supported Yanukovych and his allies, anti-Maidan protesters, law enforcers, opposition leaders. Meanwhile, Maidan civil volunteers had the support of all regions. Euromaidan protesters were hugely supported by the West and Center with a neutral attitude to them in the South and East. The Maidan self-defense and the Western countries had a positive attitude in the West and Center and negative in the South and East.
The attitude five years on
As five years have passed from the end of the Revolution of Dignity, 35% of the respondents still support the Euromaidan, 4% of them didn’t support it before but comprehended its value later on.
Some 28% keeps the negative opinion on the events, another 27% are somewhat disappointed or doubt in Maidan’s appropriateness. The press release suggests that the latter figures might be linked to the fact that 42% think they lost from the revolution, 22% feel benefited from it.
“After all, we gained the signed EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, visa waiver, raised national consciousness, the growth of unity and patriotism, we ditched from the oppression of the corrupt government and Russia. Nevertheless, the Revolution of Dignity kick-started such negative events as the war on Russia, lost Crimea and a part of the Donbas, mass deaths in the east, as well as the economic crisis and power vacuum,” the summary of the survey reads.
- Russia prepared to occupy Crimea back in 2010 and other things we learned from Yanukovych’s treason trial
- 32 exclusive photos to remember the Euromaidan revolution
- Postcolonial syndrome, or Why do revolutions occur one after another in Ukraine?
- Lies about Ukraine’s Euromaidan revolution that just won’t go away
- Two photographers recreate bloodiest days of Euromaidan with virtual reality
- Stages of Russian occupation in a nutshell
- Eleven films about Euromaidan you can watch online
- Ukraine: 25 moments of independence