Article by: Vilnius Institute for Policy Analysis
While ten years have passed since the Russo-Georgian War, not the sound of bullets but of rumours, biased accounts and other means of propaganda war can still be heard.
Recent statements by former Russian and Georgian leaders are a reminder that the conflict remains unresolved. While giving an interview to Kommersant, the former Russian president Dmitrij Medvedev stressed that Georgia‘s becoming a NATO member would bring “serious consequences.“ This can be understood as an open threat to Georgia not to overstep the red line drawn by Kremlin. In the same interview, D. Medvedev stated that Swiss diplomat Heidi Tagliavini was assigned to lead an independent mission in order to investigate the reasons behind the conflict and that the mission officially concluded that Georgia was the aggressor of the military conflict. And that, in D. Medvedev’s (and Kremlin’s) opinion, was established as a historical fact: Georgia is allegedly the perpetrator of the war.
What is the actual truth, though? The above-mentioned EU-supported mission indeed made a conclusion that Georgia fired the first shots. But the Tagliavini report (as it is often referred to) thoroughly elaborated on Russia‘s multiple violations of the international law that happened before, during, and after the conflict.
However, Russia‘s violations, even though stated in the same document which D. Medvedev refers to in order to prove Georgia guilty, are presented by D. Medvedev only as different interpretations, but not clear facts investigated and established by the mission. It is interesting to note that in such cases facts are processed filtering and twisting them in the same document, not by taking them from different contexts.
In other words, selectivity wins: a fact is only what gives rise to the desired, pre-established position, whereas the unfavourable facts are discredited as interpretations permeated with subjective moral sentiments.
In this way, having chosen and emphasised what is desired, a rather simplistic narrative is constructed where Georgia fired first, thus, Georgia started the war, thus, Georgia is the one to blame. And all this is suggested as the ultimate truth despite the countless provocations that happened before the first shot was fired, and the international norms that were violated during the course of the war.
Although ten years have passed since the Russo-Georgian War, there is still a lot to be done in order to bring about peace. As mentioned in the Tagliavini report, as long as the obvious facts are not acknowledged, peace in South Caucasus does not stand a chance to be established.
- Ten years after: why Georgia failed to reintegrate its occupied territories
- Ten years after the Russian-Georgian war: the Kremlin’s unlearned lessons
- Top 10 Russian lies about the Georgia war
- Kremlin hybrid war tactics in Georgia, 2008, and Ukraine, 2014-2015 | Infographic
- Georgia ’08: Putin’s first dabble in hybrid war gone wrong
- The Russian war against Georgia is far from over