Putin thinks he’s winning and is expanding his Stalinist attack on West, Pavlova says


International, More

Many in the West following the decision of more than 20 countries to expel Russian diplomats to show solidarity with the British think that Vladimir Putin has been driven into an untenable position and soon will be forced to back down in the face of this Western resolve, Irina Pavlova says.

Irina Pavlova, Russian historian

Irina Pavlova

But that is not how Putin views things, the US-based Russian historian says he doesn’t feel he “trapped” but rather in a position to intensify his attacks on the West because he “considers himself smarter” that his Western counterparts and thus is “raising the stakes” in ways that the West has forgotten how to counter .

According to Pavlova, the Kremlin’s strategy toward the West has been in place for some time and is based on “a vision of Russia as a great power in the Stalinist style for namely under him and in his understanding, the country experienced the peak of great power status, having generated a model for emulation.”

The only difference is that Stalin strove to Sovietize Western countries while “Putin and company seek the fundamental weakening of the West and the destruction of close coordination between Europe and the US.”

Given that goal, the historian continues, the Kremlin’s power depends not on its GDP but on “consistently, decisively and aggressively speculating on the weaknesses and problems of present-day Western civilization” and on Moscow’s ability to use the technological achievements of the West “to strengthen [the Russian] regime.”

Putin’s strength is further enhanced by the fact that he “adroitly plays on the human weaknesses of the representatives of Western countries, corrupting some successfully, dividing and perverting them.” As for the sanctions the West threatens, “they only strengthen this regime above all in the eyes of its own population.”

In response to the Western expulsion of Russian diplomats, Pavlova says, Putin adopted not only the mirror response of expelling Western diplomats but directly “accused the countries of Western civilization not simply in Russophobia but in the support of Nazism.” Unfortunately, up to now, few in the West have taken note of this in the serious way it deserves.

That charge is part of a special operation which is “the most important part of the great power strategy of the present-day Kremlin.” Today in fact, the Stalinists in Russia are enjoying their greatest heyday since 1953.

And while the West doesn’t want to admit it, it is confronted by a Russia that has become “a Brave Re-Stalinized World.”

This strategy, Pavlova argues, is being used by the Kremlin to “completely justify both the Stalinist USSR and Stalin, who [in its vision] ‘saved Western civilization from Nazism/fascism.” Indeed, “the Russian authorities have for a long time successfully privatized the role of the chief world fighter” against “the invented threat” of the revival of Nazism.

Putin’s Russia seeks to portray the Western world as facilitating this invented threat “not only in the former Soviet republics of the USSR – Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Ukraine – but in the Western countries themselves,” she argues. And it has created an organization “The World Without Nazism” with branches in many countries including the US to push this line.

“The sad fact of present-day reality is that the West is not prepared to oppose modernized Stalinism,” Pavlova says.

Expelling diplomats and imposing economic sanctions “will not solve the problem. Nor will even a revived containment as that term is usually understood do the trick, she argues.


Instead, the West must face up to the challenge of how to “force Russia forever to stop falling for the temptations of Stalinist great power notions.” And to do that, it must start with an understanding of what it means that Putin has chosen Stalin and Stalinism as his models for emulation and legitimation.

“It is possible,” Pavlova says, “that “’the key’ to the resolution of the world problem known as ‘Russia’ should be sought precisely here.” What must happen, she argues, is that the Nuremberg tribunal must be reconstituted to render judgment on the other totalitarian system of the 20th century, Soviet communism.

“Only by depriving present-day Stalinism of its foundation can one hope for a normal relationship with Russia in a globalized world.”

Read More:

Edited by: A. N.

Dear readers! Since you’ ve made it to this point, we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away, which is why it's extra important to provide news about Ukraine in English. We are a small independent journalist team on a shoestring budget, have no political or state affiliation, and depend on our readers to keep going (using the chanсe - a big thank you to our generous supporters, we couldn't make it without you.)  If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


  1. Avatar Ihor Dawydiak says:

    While there is nothing wrong with denouncing Russia’s communist past and its current brand of fascism, that alone will not alter Putin’s imperialism as talk is cheap. In fact, Putin would much prefer such a battle but there is a battle that he would abhor and it is not military in nature. To begin with, what needs to be done is the imposition of strangulating social and economic sanctions against Russia with the all out ban of the importation of Russian oil and gas to Europe as a first priority. And yes, this would indeed hurt Europe although this could be offset with the temporary importation of oil and gas from countries such as Saudi Arabia and the US. However, the pain inflicted against Russia would be far, far greater which in turn could bankrupt Putin’s regime and as such drive the rodent back into his lair in the swamps of Muscovy as he himself only respects raw power. All that is needed is the political will, courage, patience and perseverance on behalf of the Western powers. It can be and should be done.

    1. Avatar MichaelA says:

      her essay doesnt make sense to me
      if putin doesnt care about diplomats being expelled then why should he care about a tribunal judging stalins actions?
      i like her essay and i like a lot of what she says
      but i agree that only sanctions will affect the russian elite
      and only if we in the west stop helping the russian elite to hide their money in the west

      1. Avatar Ihor Dawydiak says:

        Exactly. As part of the sanctions process, the Western powers must put a squeeze on Russian oligarchs, their families, their friends and associates who have assets in the West. As such, seizing or freezing their wealth will have a direct impact on Putin since they are key components in supporting the criminal regime in the Kremlin.

      2. Avatar Tony says:

        I agree, Putin accuses the west of nazisim to enrage his population against the west. Her solution is basically to fight fire with fire by showing that Stalin was Hitler’s accomplice in ww2(Molotov-Ribbentrop). While this is true, the Russian population would probably only view such statements from the west as an attempt at psychological projection.

  2. Avatar zorbatheturk says:

    Resurgent RuSSo-Soviet totalitarianism WILL NOT STAND!

  3. Avatar Mephisto says:

    he is not smarter, he is a dumb KGB scumbag who ruined his own country.

  4. Avatar Patrick Verswevelt says:

    I think the west likes Russia’s path towards Stalinism. It’s a path that will lead to self-destruction. Also, who says that the West wants normal relations with this Russia? I think the West will want first Stalinisme, then Russia to desintegrate in different regions, and then have normal relations with those regions.