Head of the EU Delegation to Ukraine: unknown if Ukraine will get membership roadmap in future

Hugues Mingarelli. Photo: kmu.gov.ua

Hugues Mingarelli. Photo: kmu.gov.ua 

News, Politics

On 24 November, the 5th Eastern Partnership Summit took place in Brussels. Despite the difficulties of the preparation period, the final Declaration of the Summit has been signed. One of its clauses didn’t satisfy Ukraine. It concerned a repetition of what had already been repeated at the last 2015 summit in Riga, namely, that the EU only recognizes Ukraine’s European aspirations and choice of the European direction of development. Kyiv had issues with a new clause stating that the recognition remained valid in the context of the last December statement. In December 2016, after prolonged negotiations with The Netherlands, the EU issued a special statement re-asserting the fact that the Association itself does not envisage Ukraine’s membership in the European Union. It is in this context that “the participants of the summit recognize the European aspirations and European choice of partners,” the document said. Therefore, no EU membership roadmap was adopted for Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova after the summit.

Prior to the event, Ukrainian media reported that the country could lose EUR 600 mn of macro-financial aid from the EU because of not implementing measures needed for the next tranche. Also, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko departed to the Summit amid a controversy at home. Against the background of the protests led by ex-president of Georgia and ex-Odesa Oblast governor Michael Saakashvili, a group of Georgians were kidnapped. It is believed that all of this did not have a good impact on the Ukraine-EU relationships on the eve of the Summit and it is still unclear whether Ukraine will receive the EUR 600 mn.

Euromaidan Press together with Ukrainskiy Tyzhden took an exclusive interview with the head of the EU Delegation to Ukraine Hugues Mingarelli about the results of the Summit.

How would you assess the results of the Summit for Ukraine?

The results of the Summit for Ukraine are positive. The Summit has acknowledged the achievements of Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova. They have to take note of the fact that now we have to implement the ambitious Association Agreement, including the DCFTA (the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area) without any delays. We also welcomed the active cooperation of the partner countries in establishing of the European Energy Union and committing to bolstering energy security through interconnections, sustainable use of energy resources, enhanced energy efficiency and use of renewable energy. The harmonization of digital markets will be fostered in the framework of the EU4Digital initiative, to eliminate existing obstacles and barriers of pan-European online services for citizens, public administrations, and businesses. Obviously, Ukraine will be one of the countries to benefit from the 20 deliverables for 2020. The Summit has again re-stated that the EU remains committed in its support to the territorial integrity, independence and sovereignty of all its partners, so the overall result in my view is positive.

What does the paragraph about the European Aspirations of Ukraine in the Final Resolution of the Summit mean?

This means once again that the EU acknowledged the fact that Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova want to move closer to the EU and this confirms our wish to strengthen the political association and economic integration of Ukraine with the EU through the implementation of the Association Agreement, including the DCFTA. We will do everything possible to support reforms in Ukraine and bring country closer to the EU through increased trade, investment and visa-free people-to-people contacts.

Maybe in the future there will be some roadmap or an algorithm for future membership?

I cannot answer this question. But what is sure is that we are determined to bring Ukraine closer to the EU by harmonizing its legislation with the EU one and by taking over European standards, all with the EU’s financial assistance and sound advice.

How did the situation with the deportation of Mikheil Saakashvili’s allies affect the image of Ukraine during the Summit?

I do not want to speculate what impact all this had on the Summit. I can just tell you that we hope that the freedom of expression and association will be respected in Ukraine, because Ukraine is a democracy and it has to stick to its basic principles. And obviously it has to be done in a peaceful way, people must be allowed to freedom of expression and protest according to the existing laws. If some demonstrators become violent, it is normal that law enforcement agencies intervene. But they must be allowed to demonstrate, express their dissatisfaction in a peaceful way.

What should Ukraine do to improve its trade with the EU?

For Ukraine to improve its already high trade turnover (approx. 40% of all trade is with EU-28) with the EU, the key will be a regulatory convergence, which means that Ukraine has to harmonize its laws with the European norms and standards in such key areas like food safety, technical and industrial standards. This will open more possibilities for trade.

For this purpose, we work with our Ukrainian counterparts to allow the alignment of Ukrainian legislation to with the EU one. Once Ukraine has taken on the bulk of our norms and standards, trade will increase in a positive way and bring new jobs and investments into the country.

European Union has some quotas for trade.

There are a few tariff rate quotas for a few products, but it is not a lot. The main obstacle to the exports of Ukrainian products to the EU are norms and standards. Ukraine should find new partners and niche markets; invest in exporting culture, language skills, and marketing. Once this is done, trade will increase as Ukraine is very competitive when we look at average wages of qualified labour.

Why might Ukraine not receive EUR 600 mn of macro-financial support from the EU?

Ukraine has made significant progress in a wide range of areas since the Macro-financial operation was initiated in 2015 (in public finance management, governance and transparency, the energy sector, and the business environment, and others).

However, four of the twenty-one measures linked to this third and final tranche of Macro-financial assistance remain outstanding.

  • The first condition relates to Ukraine’s commitment not to introduce trade-restricting measures – the ban on timber export has not been lifted.
  • The second condition relates to the launch of e-declarations verification process.
  • The third is about adoption of a law on the credit register.
  • And the fourth touches upon the issue of verifying the information about beneficiary company owners.

And as there is no progress on these four conditions, there is a problem.

As for 2018, EU will support Ukraine through a cooperation program worth EUR 200 mn and Ukraine could always ask for a new macro-financial assistance programme.

How would you evaluate the progress of Ukraine in judicial reform, the selection of the Supreme Court judges in particular?

For the Supreme Court, the procedure that has been used was fair and transparent. Also there are some questions about the personalities of some selected judges. Now the priority is to create the Anti-Corruption Court. It has to be created in the nearest future. The Venice Commission has given its legal opinion. The Ukrainian authorities should implement the Venice Commission recommendation and create an Anti-Corruption Court without any delay.  

 

Edited by: Alya Shandra

Tags: , ,

  • zorbatheturk

    That guy defines bad hair day.

  • AmounRah

    Looks like reality is sloooooowly sinking in…
    Let’s wait for the next episode.

    • zorbatheturk

      Farkov, Bogov, and Sodov: RuSzsian law firm.

      • AmounRah

        As one of the most intelligent philosophers of our time said:
        English, mother trucker, do you speak it?

        • zorbatheturk

          You certainly don’t.

          • AmounRah

            lol, clearly

          • zorbatheturk

            Bogovsky, screwdriver. You ain’t the sharpest tool in the box.

          • AmounRah

            *whispers*
            Hey mr. smarty pants. I think it will work better if you reply to them directly…just saying.

            xoxo
            Amoun

          • zorbatheturk

            Farkov, maggot. Crawl back up Putin’s a s s.

          • AmounRah

            Whats with Ukie trolls and their fetish for hom…..OOOOOHHHH I GET IT!!!
            AZOV and Right Sector does not let you guys express your feelings to each other freely, so you are frustrated, and you are too scared to take it our on the Ukrainian army gang that runs UA right now so you take it out on others!
            Oh man, all this hate makes 100% sense now….

          • zorbatheturk

            You ain’t no psychologist. You are a psych case.

          • AmounRah

            Oh man….lol
            the irony in *you* saying that….

          • zorbatheturk

            Freud asked me when he needed advice.

          • AmounRah

            Oohhh
            Are you talking to him now? Do you see him often?

          • zorbatheturk

            I got Ziggy on speed dial.