Putin’s anti-Ukrainian propaganda playing role state anti-Semitism did in Soviet times, Ikhlov says

While being imprisoned by Russian mercenaries in occupied Ukrainian city Donetsk, Ukrainian activist Iryna Dovhan endured hours of public humiliation and beatings orchestrated by the representatives of the Russian world unleashed by Putin. (Image: social media)

While being imprisoned by Russian mercenaries in occupied Ukrainian city Donetsk, Ukrainian activist Iryna Dovhan endured hours of public humiliation and beatings orchestrated by the representatives of the Russian world unleashed by Putin. (Image: social media) 

International, More

Vladimir Putin’s “rabid” anti-Ukrainian propaganda resembles and is intended to have a similar outcome to Soviet state anti-Semitism, or “anti-Zionism” as it was called, Yevgeny Ikhlov says. And like the earlier one, Putin’s current one is about “killing off of another culture” and absorbing its bearers into a Moscow-approved effort.

The Russian commentator points out that “’anti-Zionism’ had many goals, but one of them was directed at the Jews and was designed to destroy their sense of identity. Jews were intended to stop feeling part of the Jewish people … and instead become ‘Soviet citizens of Jewish nationality,’ an ethnic minority.”

“The Soviet powers very much needed the Jews as experts, qualified workers in various spheres, and as promoters of Russification, in particular in Ukraine, Belarus, in the Baltics, in the Caucasus and in Central Asia,” Ikhlov says. “But for this, Jews had to be completely denationalized” and thus serve “the anti-Semitic regime.”

Some Soviet Jews were frightened into this by talk about revanchism in Germany or the prospects that the regime would not defend them against “popular anti-Semitism,” while others were attracted to this position by “the carrot” of being given at least “a quota-based integration into the establishment.”

In a similar way, Ikhlov says, “Soviet power very much needed the Ukrainians, an irreplaceable part of the apparatus.” But with the rise of Stalin, Soviet multi-national messianism was replaced by “an empire of a Bolshevik ‘khalifate,’” in which any nationalism was to be swallowed up by “the more customary model of Third Rome (neo-Byzantine) Muscovite rule.”

That led Stalin to declare “a real war against Ukraine,” first with the destruction of the Ukrainian peasantry by the terror famine in 1932-33 and then with the destruction of the Ukrainian intellectual elite in a series of fabricated political trials.

Over time, Ikhlov says, “the more people from the eastern oblasts of Ukraine, above all from Dnipropetrovsk (now Dnipro), were recruited into the party apparatus, primarily into the ideological sector, the more efforts were undertaken for the russification of the Ukrainian intelligentsia, [Ukrainian] culture, and [Ukrainian] education.”

In the 1990s, after the collapse of Soviet power, the Russian political elite was divided between those who were prepared to accept the existence of a separate and distinct Ukrainian nation and those who simply wanted to continue as they had, working to support the integration of Ukrainians into a newly defined “Russian world.”

“But from the start of 2014,” Ikhlov says, “anti-Ukrainianism became just the same consensus between the powers and the ‘left-nationalist’ opposition as anti-Semitism united in the 1970s and 1980s the [Soviet] authorities and the systemic ‘Russian nationalist’ opposition.” In short, “great power hysteria broke out over Ukraine 45 years later than over ‘Zionism.’”

The “nightmare” years of Soviet attacks on Jews were part of his youth, Ikhlov says, and he recalled them in 2014 when people in Moscow recognized that the Maidan wasn’t going to fail. Since that time, he continues, he has often felt “the paradoxical” nature of the propaganda “directed at Jews and at Ukrainians.”

Advertisement

Putin’s current and ongoing efforts directed at “’the internal colonization of Ukraine’ are primarily [another] effort of its ‘culturecide’ and the liquidation of independence (democracy above all) and the transformation of Ukrainians into ‘Moskaly,’” a term that he points out initially meant a soldier in Russian imperial service rather than an ethnic Russian.


Related:

Edited by: A. N.

Dear readers! Since you’ ve made it to this point, we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away, which is why it's extra important to provide news about Ukraine in English. We are a small independent journalist team on a shoestring budget, have no political or state affiliation, and depend on our readers to keep going (using the chanсe - a big thank you to our generous supporters, we couldn't make it without you.)  If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

  1. Avatar Ihor Dawydiak says:

    Since the 1654 Treaty of Pereyaslav successive Russian Administrations have tried to subjugate and assimilate the Ukrainian people but have never been able to succeed in their sordid task. Therefore, how could Putin the Pederast succeed where all of his predecessors have failed? Inviting a “Trojan Horse” into your household comes to mind but that most certainly would not be the answer. In fact, there has never been an answer nor will there ever be an answer. Isn’t that so Vovochka?

    1. Avatar RedSquareMaidan says:

      This is why little Vovochka wanted his invasion to be in protection of the Russian language so he could try to russify, those in Ukraine that spoke Russian and claim them as Russian. The rest would be nazis of course.

  2. Avatar zorbatheturk says:

    A good reason for Ukraine to have nothing to do with RuSSia aside from shooting at them.

  3. Avatar Mr. Jackson says:

    Ukrap looser are not happy. Oh, why am I not surprised!