What do Ukrainian drone makers have to accept to win Pentagon contracts? Experts document “draconian conditions”

Below 50% foreign ownership triggers a Security Control Agreement under which the company must be led by a US citizen.
interceptor drones General Cherry (Chereshnia)
Interceptor drones General Cherry (Chereshnia). Photo credits: General Cherry (Chereshnia)
What do Ukrainian drone makers have to accept to win Pentagon contracts? Experts document “draconian conditions”

Ukrainian defense companies entering the US market face draconian US protectionist conditions, including the formation of a US legal entity and partial disclosure of technical documentation, Defense Express analyzes. The analysis comes as two Ukrainian companies — F-Drones, via the US-registered Ukrainian Defense Drones Tech Corporation (UDD), and General Cherry Corp — compete in the Pentagon's $1.1 billion Drone Dominance Program. 

The reality check is stark: reports of Ukrainian drones winning Pentagon contracts obscure the fact that the Pentagon's procurement framework does not allow direct sales from Ukrainian suppliers.

Bureaucratic and ownership requirements

US defense procurement requires that the contractor be a US legal entity. To register, that entity must be registered with the US Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) as a defense manufacturer, demonstrate non-use of prohibited Chinese components, satisfy cybersecurity requirements, and meet classified-information access standards.

Foreign ownership thresholds shape what's possible. A 100%-foreign-owned entity faces approval timelines measured in years and is unlikely to receive DCSA approval for classified contracts.

A foreign-ownership share below 50% triggers a Security Control Agreement (SCA) regime, under which the company must be officially led by a US citizen, foreigners are barred from classified information, and registration takes months. The only foreign-ownership level that avoids these additional procedures is below 5%.

What Ukrainian companies must accept

For Ukrainian drone makers targeting US government contracts, the practical implications are stark. The right to sign contracts and conduct correspondence with the US Department of Defense may pass to US-citizen executives.

The "no Chinese components" verification requires at least partial disclosure of technical documentation to US authorities. Production must be relocated or duplicated on US soil, creating American jobs.

And, critically, none of this happens without significant lobbying, often through partnership with a large US prime.

Kongsberg-Raytheon working model, and its Drone Dominance Program echo

Norway's Kongsberg has faced the same procedure. The weapon producer used the partnership model to sell its Naval Strike Missile in the US. Rather than entering the US market directly, Kongsberg paired with Raytheon.

Raytheon handled the procurement promotion, particularly positioning NSM as the armament for the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) class, in exchange for technology transfer, US localization, and final assembly on American soil.

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Ads are disabled for Euromaidan patrons.

    Support us on Patreon for an ad-free experience.

    Already with us on Patreon?

    Enter the code you received on Patreon or by email to disable ads for 6 months

    Invalid code. Please try again

    Code successfully activated

    Ads will be hidden for 6 months.