Several Western organizations consider Crimea Russian



Analysis & Opinion

Article by: Olia Datsiuk

The campaign against Coca-Cola in Ukrainian social networks has forced the company to apologize for a map that depicts Crimea as part of Russia.

At the same time, in its released public statement the company still has not indicated who, in its view, has ownership of the peninsula. The company’s statement simply points out that Coca-Cola does not get involved in the internal matters of its customer countries.

The scandal with the American corporation has highlighted the fact that not all commercial brands, organizations, or even media consider the annexation of Crimea illegal. Instances where Crimea has been added to the map of Russia have been found online repeatedly, even if they are subsequently removed by the original posters.

Hromadske TV has summarized the most notorious incidents where the Ukrainian peninsula was painted in the tricolors of Russia.


cokeOn January 5, there was an appeal in Ukrainian social media to boycott the products of the Coca-Cola company because of the map of Russia posted on the corporation’s official site in the Russian social media network VKontakte.

Initially, the site posted a map of Russia without Crimea, the Kaliningrad region or the Kuril Islands (parts of which are claimed by both Russia and Japan — Ed.). But later the page posted an apology along with a revised map that included these territories.

This incident generated a storm of criticism from Ukrainian users who called for a boycott of Coca-Cola beverages. The scandalous post was removed, and Clyde C. Tuggle, senior vice president, chief public affairs and communications officer at the company, apologized for the misunderstanding. His letter of apology was presented to Valeriy Chaly, Ukraine’s ambassador to the U.S.


After the Coca-Cola affair, the company’s main competitor, PepsiCo, was caught in a similar error. Users of social networks noticed a map of Russia that included Crimea on the company’s Russian site. A company brochure was included in which Crimea was shown as belonging to Russia. After the Coca-Cola scandal, Pepsi’s Russian representatives quickly removed this image from the site. However, this brochure can still be seen in the Web archive through the saved link. Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has expressed concern to the Pepsi Corporation for the posting of a map on the company’s site depicting Crimea as part of Russia.


The International Football Federation FIFA has also apologized to Ukraine for a video that was screened during the presentation of the official emblem of the 2018 World Cup in Moscow. The video, which was projected on the façade of the Bolshoi Theatre, depicted a map with Crimea as part of Russia, the host country for the championship. The International Football Federation subsequently removed this video from its YouTube page and apologized to the Football Federation of Ukraine, stressing that a Russian creative agency prepared the video project on behalf of the organizing committee. Despite the apology, the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry sent a note of protest to FIFA.

larousse2Éditions Larousse

In October last year the French publishing house Éditions Larousse issued a socio-economic atlas of the world for 2016, where Crimea is presented as Russian territory. The photo spread rapidly on the Internet, triggering outrage among many users.

The Embassy of Ukraine in France called this incident a “very unpleasant surprise” and demanded that the map be corrected. The French Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded rapidly to the scandal and confirmed that it does not recognize the Russian annexation of Crimea and is committed to the territorial integrity of Ukraine. The electronic version of the atlas was corrected, but a number of printed copies with the error reached the stores nonetheless.

oxfordOxford University Press

The British Oxford University Press published a socio-economic atlas of the world for 2016 according to which the Crimean peninsula belongs to Russia.

The Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs sent an official letter to the Oxford University Press stressing the illegality of the annexation of Crimea and asking for a correction. The publishing house responded evasively, promising to “change the terminology regarding the status of Crimea and to add the UN’s official position on this issue.”

usatodayUSA Today

The American newspaper USA Today ignored Washington’s official position on the non-recognition of the Crimean annexation and on February 10 last year published a map of Ukraine on its front page without including the Crimean peninsula. Foreign Policy magazine brought attention to the error, commenting that “while the Western world refuses to recognize Russia’s annexation of Crimea, one of its largest newspapers just did.” The newspaper has not responded to requests to comment on the incident.

Yandex and Google

Two large companies are trying to play it both ways — Google and Yandex (Russian Internet company which operates the largest search engine in Russia — Ed.). With many users in Ukraine and Russia, they developed two versions of Crimean maps. On Yandex maps for users in Ukraine, the peninsula is depicted as belonging to Ukraine; for Russians, it belongs to Russia. A similar strategy has been adopted by Google. In the Russian version, a clear boundary line separates the peninsula from mainland Ukraine. In the Ukrainian version, a dotted line is used.


The most recent issue of the Italian geopolitical magazine Limes included a map of the world where Crimea is painted in the same colors as Russia. Ukraine’s Ambassador to Italy Yevhen Perelyhin has demanded that the publisher of the magazine “bring the map into compliance with international law.” In his letter the ambassador stated that either this is a technical error or a deliberate provocation  “that is a challenge to the territorial integrity of Ukraine.”


Translated by: Anna Mostovych
Source: Hromadske

Since you’re here – we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away. But we’re here to stay, and will keep on providing quality, independent, open-access information on Ukrainian reforms, Russia’s hybrid war, human rights violations, political prisoners, Ukrainian history, and more. We are a non-profit, don’t have any political sponsors, and never will. If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation!

Tags: , ,

  • W8post

    One cannot blame the American conpanies (no writing error); Americans think [in general] that the world ends with their borders. The European companies should know better!

    • OlenaG

      I can blame the American Companies for not aligning with publicly announced American Gov’t Policy. And no Americans do not think the World is inclusive to their borders. America has numerous immigrants from foreign countries while many Americans are first, second, etc generation immigrants. Additionally, most are very aware of where a lot of Americans are stationed abroad with the Dept of State and the Dept of Defense, as well as with many private sector companies.

      • W8post

        1) I said ‘in GENERAL’! 2) You lack much vision about Americans IN GENERAL! 3) Go to ANY American newspaper, like ‘the New York Times’, ‘the Washington Post’, i.e. and read the comments on ANY article you like and you’ll find out what Americans (in GENERAL) know about what’s happening outside their country!
        There was recently a questionnaire (now FAMOUS) about Ukraine! People were asked a) would they support [military] help and most answered YES! and b) they were asked ‘do you know where Ukraine is situated on the map’ and most answered they did NOT know! So they are in favour of helping a country the even don’t know [about].We are talking about Americans! CHEERS!

  • Volker Trauth

    What about IKEA selling their products on Crimea by pretending there is a store in Sevastopol which does not exist, while the IKEA store in Krasnodar, Russian Federation, delivers the merchandise to people who request them on the peninsula? We pointed at it and got no reaction. SMA-Ukr group on Facebook
    About this and other sanction related finds:

    • OlenaG

      Interesting and thanks for the links.

      • Volker Trauth

        You are welcome and maybe you can move more than we could. IKEA headquarters in Netherlands denied any knowledge of this or involvement, so it is either a local initiative of Krasnodar store management or they are lying. Anyway, the brand name is in use and the services have not stopped since we discovered them in october 2015. There is a channel on v-kontakte where distributor and hopeful customers communicate. You find it all in our Facebook group page. By the way, Alya Sh. is member with us. :)

  • Dirk Smith

    These are the same ignorant ones who unknowingly buy into muscovite propaganda. Clueless about affairs of the world.

  • OlenaG

    Did anyone notice that the entities listed are left of center (socialist)/PC companies or countries?

    • Nowhere Girl

      So? I’m leftist too and I strongly support Ukraine.

    • W8post

      CocaCola, PepsiCo, Kraft [and so on] do NOT have a political vision. They ALL go straight through the middle [of politics] as long as they can SELL! It’s called CAPITALISM and has nothing to do with politics, neither left nor right!

  • Scradje

    Putler’s loathsome regime is able to benefit in two ways; the descendants of the crypto-Marxist western ‘useful idiots’ who used to glorify Stalin, are today occupying influential roles in government, corporations and media. Now they are joined by the putler-friendly crypto fascist parties who recognise a fellow traveler when they see one. Many of these eurotrash parties are blatantly pro-putler, such as Ukip, The Dutch Party for Freedom and France’s FN, which is even bankrolled by entities connected to Yedinaya Rossiya and of course sent ‘observers’ to legitimize the fake, gunpoint referendum in occupied Crimea. In fact, whoever the French decide to elect as their next president, they get a Kremlin asset: Hollande, Sarkozy or Le Pen.

  • Nowhere Girl

    I believe that – at least in the most clearly commercial cases (Coca-Cola etc. – I would exclude Limes because in that case it’s more likely to be a conscious political position) it’s not about whether they consider the Crimean anschluss illegal. I suspect they don’t care about it. They just want to make money. And while I don’t support showing Russia that yes, it’s OK, it’s Christmas time, so peace & love & nobody remembers there is a war – I realize they are in a hard position. If they show Crimea as Ukrainian, Russian customers will protest, if they show it as Russian, Ukrainians will protest… I defenitely don’t condone any kind of abandoning the smaller market in favor of the larger one, but it’s a fact that after the anschluss also companies have gotten themselves into a situation where there is no possibility of solving it in a way that would satisfy everybody.