Russian analyst: China “the real military danger” to Russia

 

International

If anyone is going to carry out military aggression against Russia, Aleksandr Khramchikhin, the deputy head of the Moscow Institute for Political and Military Analysis, says, it will not be the West as many Russians think but rather China; and when China does so – and that rather than if is the real question, it will win.

In an article on AsiaRussia.ru yesterday, Khramchikhin argues that a Chinese invasion of Russia is almost inevitable because “objectively” China cannot survive “in its current borders. It must become much bigger if it does not want to become much smaller” and it needs resources Russia and Kazakhstan have but Southeast Asia does not.

“Of course,” he continues, “a peaceful form of expansion (economic and demographic) would be preferable, but a military variant is not excluded.” Beijing’s military preparedness moves strongly suggest that Chinese leaders are thinking about it. Indeed, “in recent years, the Chinese army has been carrying out exercises which it is simply impossible to treat as anything but preparation for aggression against Russia.”

China is no longer dependent on Russia for arms. Not only has it long demonstrated its ability to steal American and European technology in that area, Khramchikhin says, but its own domestic product has so improved that Russia no longer enjoys unquestioned superiority over China in the military field and in some areas is already far behind.

The only sector within that branch where China continues to purchase significant amounts of Russian military technology is the navy which it would use in the event of operations against Taiwan and the United States.  It is “obvious” that there isn’t going to be a naval war between China and Russia; if and when it occurs, it will be between two land forces.

And for these forces, China has not been acquiring “any technology” from Russia “because precisely that would be used against Russia in the event of a war,” the Moscow analyst points out. Moreover, he adds, China has now escaped from any dependence on Russia in its air force as well.

Despite the warm words between Moscow and Beijing in recent months, it is important to point out, Khramchikhin says, that recently, military technology cooperation between the two countries has broken down, partially because of the rapid degradation of the Russian military industrial complex and partially because China wants to have a free hand against Russia.

Qualitatively and quantitatively, the armed forces of Russia and China are “now approximately equal,” but China is moving ahead in many areas. It already vastly outnumbers Russian forces, its training programs are better and more intensive, and its weapons systems are improving relative to those of Russia as well.

Thus, Khramchikhin concludes, “we have no chances in a conventional war” with China, something Beijing understands.  Russia still has vast superiority in strategic nuclear forces but even there it is losing ground, especially in terms of the number of intermediate ballistic missiles which might be used and perhaps, although the data are unavailable, in tactical nuclear weapons.

Moscow would be reluctant to use tactical nuclear weapons because it would be employing them on its own territory, the Moscow analyst says, and Chinese strategic rockets are sufficient to be able to “destroy the main cities of European Russia which it doesn’t need” because in that part of Russia “there are many people and few resources.”

Consequently, Moscow would be reluctant to move from conventional to nuclear weapons, and the notion that it could keep China from doing so is “a myth” that needs to be dispelled.  Indeed, Khramchikhin says, an examination of the military situation between the two countries provides only one lesson for Russians: “learn Chinese.”

Source: windowoneurasia.blogspot.com

Dear readers! Since you’ ve made it to this point, we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away, which is why it's extra important to provide news about Ukraine in English. We are a small independent journalist team on a shoestring budget, have no political or state affiliation, and depend on our readers to keep going (using ťhe chance - a big thank you to our generous supporters, we couldn't make it without you). We are now $5,000 short of our financial goal and need your support to continue working. If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation!

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments

  1. Avatar RegisteredName says:

    Let China do to Russia what Russia did to Ukraine.

    1. Avatar Don Casavant says:

      And add one item…please do it next week!

  2. Avatar PoeTentiate says:

    Russia is very good at creating enemies of states that have the resources to oppose it. They have completely and knowingly brought all these consequences upon themselves, by remaining the last nakedly imperial “power”.

  3. Avatar Kruton says:

    The Chinese Navy vs. U.S. Navy . The Chinese know they would be crushed. China needs a secure oil supply. That exists in only one place,Siberia.

  4. Avatar Paul P. Valtos says:

    I could see that happening. Lets face it. Russia’s defeat at the hands of the Japanese prior to WWI was a disaster to the Czarist government. If there is any worsening of weather in Eurasia, Russia will be looking at the gun of China since it will need Russian resources, oil and gas to continue to run their country. Why pay for something you can just take at the point of a gun.

  5. Avatar Murf says:

    Tom Clancy wrote about this scenario in the book, “Bear and the Dragon.” In the book the US helps Russia defeat China.
    Somehow I don’t see it playing out that way now.

  6. Avatar Adam Rytwiński says:

    You know guys, during the communist (USSR) times we had one, fine joke in Poland. I don’t remember it now, but the conclusion was… Polish-Chinese border ;)))

  7. Avatar C_Low says:

    There is more illegal Chinese today in Siberia than ethnic Russians. If Putin could get past his KGB 80’s world view he could see that the liberalized west is not invading anyone unless you consider mutual economic trade/business as invasion. Granted Russia would not be the decider for their neighbors like during the Soviet days but the threat was and is only one way. China on the other hand for reasons of resources, farmland, and general land is a real present threat.

  8. Avatar Joseph Ruggiero says:

    There is a natural love and respect between Americans and the Chinese people. Russians have shown no love or respect toward anyone except themselves. I’m glad that China is finally starting to see the Russians for what they really are.