Kremlin propaganda copies Slobodan Milošević’s methods in the war against Ukraine 



Mykhailo Ramach

Truth is the first victim of any war. Opposing sides have always presented biased information. Propagandists were governed by the fact that during war the majority of people are unable to verify even what happens in another district of their city, let alone in another part of their country or outside. In our times, however, it is much more difficult to hide facts and fool people. 

However, the example of Russian propagandists proves that past methods are still very effective. Russians are monkeying the methods with which Milošević achieved great popularity and mass support from the citizens for the war in Croatia, and later in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The propagandists first claimed tirelessly that the Serbs in Croatia were in danger, as ultra-nationalists and chauvinists, the ideological successors of those who had been on the side of the Third Reich during World War II, had come to power. As there was no direct threat, the Belgrade media constantly reported on the sufferings of Croatian Serbs in the past and warned that Croatian extremists were planning a new Serbian genocide.

Serbian propaganda spread hatred towards all things Croatian

Besides political activists, the campaign included scientists, writers, actors, singers, priests, and former generals. They called for Croatian Serbs to band together in the face of impending violence, and assured that Serbia would do everything to protect them. At the same time, they tried to discredit current and former Croatian leaders. Historians claimed that Croatians had never had a state of their own, and had always been slaves to foreign empires in the past. Language experts claimed that Croatian was an artificial language or a western dialect of Serbian. There were those who called Croatians Catholicized Serbs.

Famous Serbian journalist Dmitrie Boarov, former Journalism professor in Novi Sad, explains why Milošević’s propaganda was so effective. “To my mind, all nationally-tinted propaganda can be successful with nations that have not achieved their national goals. This was the key characteristic of Slobodan Milošević’s propaganda. All national propaganda in particular demonstrates concern for those compatriots that face a so-called threat. Thanks to this kind of propaganda, Milošević achieved great popularity at the beginning of the Yugoslav crisis,” notes Boarov.

Propaganda influenced both Serbian citizens and Croatian Serbs. The majority did not ponder over silly claims and inadvertently accepted all the lies. Month after month, disrespect and hatred towards Croats and all things Croatian kept growing. Meanwhile political police and individual officers organized illegal Serb regiments and supplied them with weapons. The next step was the declaration of so-called Serbian autonomous oblasts and districts, later their unification into the so-called Republic of Serbian Krajina. Referendums of the separatists were a regular farce.

Unlimited information manipulation by the aggressors 

In the spring of 1991, everything was ready for the first shots to be fired. And when they sounded, an unlimited field of informational manipulation was opened. Belgrade claimed that Serbia was not part of the war. According to Serbian outlets, the Croatian forces targeted the Serb civilian population. The television showed poor refugees daily, mostly women and children and the elderly, talking about the crimes of “Croatian fascists”… Readers and viewers of such reports sympathized with the victims and demanded that the government act against the enemy effectively.

And how did they act? Serbian volunteer troops occupied villages and towns near Vukovar in the east of Croatia, around Knin and Karlovec in the central part of the country, and on the outskirts of Dubrovnik in the south; set houses, schools and churches on fire; and warned the Croats that they could not give them guarantees of safety. In other words, that they were to leave everything and go to territories under Croatian control. Sometimes they would force the people to sign documents stating they voluntarily rescinded their property. Starting summer of 1991 until spring of the following year, almost 10 percent of Croats were deported. One third of state territory ended up under the control of the illegitimate Serbian “republic.”


Belgrade television and press usually did not report on the statements of Croatian government officials and institutions. Only information that would benefit Serbia was reported from the outside world. The state news agency “Tanjug” mostly reported and commented on the statements of foreign governments, the UN Security Council or the EU, twisting or softening their content. This resulted in the citizens receiving untrue information regarding the attitude of the global community to the Balkan wars.

The Croats were called bandits, the horde, criminals, cutthroats in Serbia. According to the directives, mass media messages claimed that Serb troops never attacked first. They only defended themselves. Serbs never occupied but only liberated. Serbs did not conduct ethnic cleansing; they only encouraged those who voluntarily left their towns and villages.

Numerous Serbs are enthralled by Putin

Belgrade has always stood for fair peace, for talks, for Croatia’s right to independence. But independence without so-called Serb territory. Such propaganda was effective, as the majority of citizens did not have access to independent and reasonable information. There were no private TV channels at the time; several small independent newspapers did not influence the wider audience. Serbian-language BBC, VoA, Radio France International and Radio Liberty Free Europe starting 1994 were available to a small part of the population. It was a paradise for manipulation.

In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the local Serbs and volunteers from Serbia used the same tactics as in Croatia: first they liquidated educators, medics, engineers and lawyers of other nationalities to instill fear in the “regular people.” In the towns of Banja Luka, Bijeljina and Trebinje, all mosques were destroyed. Serb leaders claims that life together with other nations was no longer possible and that the Serbs were able to execute their national rights only on ethnically clean territories. Such “logic” led to mass liquidations in northern Bosnia and the shooting of eight thousand people in Srebrenica – the biggest crime in Europe since World War II.

Serbian journalist Dmitrie Boarov notes that there are certain parallels between Belgrade’s past propaganda and current propaganda in Moscow. He says: “I see many similarities in Putin’s propaganda, in how he expresses concern for Russians in Ukraine, with the same timely concern as Milošević had in regard to Serbs in Croatia and Bosnia. However, the problem with such propaganda is, and I am sure that it has already become a burden for Putin, that at first the leader creates nationalistic moods, and then these moods start limiting his room for political maneuver. Therefore instead of the leader commandeering politics and atmosphere, he is governed by the ardent nationalistic atmosphere he himself created. His field of action is limited; he resorts to individual measures which are in discord with the state, particularly economic, interests of the country.”

Big changes have happened in the Serbian information environment in the past 20 years. The government is no longer an untouchable monopolist. Cable operators, together with Serbian channels, broadcast dozens of foreign channels, including CNN, BBC, Al Jazeera, Euronews, and Sky News. Despite this, it seems that a major part of Serbian viewers and readers believe the official Moscow news, above all the TV channels RT and Rossiya 24. And the information of the aforementioned sources is frequently the same as it had been in Belgrade: referendums, declarations of independence, the people wanting to accede to the country that defends them, foreign volunteers rescuing the poor citizens, the neighboring country not interfering, but just providing humanitarian assistance.

It is difficult to say whether Serbians really believe what the Russians are saying. Some observers note that the Serbians are only enthralled by Putin because he is standing up against America and NATO, which bombed Serbia 15 years ago.

As to the consequences of the Balkan wars – Croatia won back all the Serb-controlled territories, Bosnia and Herzegovina became an independent state without changing its borders; the formerly autonomous Kosovo gained independence. The aggressors suffered defeat in all cases.


Source: Radio Liberty

Translation by Mariya Shcherbinina

Edited by Michael Garrood

Dear readers! Since you’ ve made it to this point, we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away, which is why it's extra important to provide news about Ukraine in English. We are a small independent journalist team on a shoestring budget, have no political or state affiliation, and depend on our readers to keep going (using the chanсe - a big thank you to our generous supporters, we couldn't make it without you.)  If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation

Tags: , ,


  1. Avatar Brent says:

    Well we have the ultranationalistic neo-fascist state (Russia)….we have the ultra Orthodox ultra conservative masses behind a megalmaniac leader (Putin)….all that is missing from the equation is NATO and EU with a conscience and some balls…and a date for the war criminals at The Hague…

  2. Avatar ENo says:

    An excellent article! Anyone old enough to remember the Balkans’ War in the 90’s and all the things that lead to that tragedy, can see the similarities. I can remember as well as it had happened yesterday that Vladimir Zhirinovsky was one of the most vocal Russia politicians supporting the actions of Milosevic. He even visited Serbia praising the brotherhood of the Serbs and the Russians. When Russia sent it’s little green men to Crimea, guess who was the first noteworthy Russian politician visiting Crimea and showing support to the pro-Russians? Vladimir Zhirinovsky. The moment I heard about it I thought that this is going to be the Balkans of the 90”s revisited.

  3. Avatar 100% truth says:

    Kosovo is part of Serbia.Serbs were not defeated in Kosovo war nor in the Bosnian War.Bosnian Serbs owned more territory than Bosniaks and Croats.If Kosovo is Independent State than Crimea is a 100% Russian land and Eastern Ukraine should be part of Russia or Independent State

  4. Avatar 100% truth says:

    Serbs were not defeated in Kosovo war.Serbs were not defeated in Bosnian War.Serbs in Kosovo war won all battles.Kosovo war ended with UN Resolution 1244.According to UN Resolution 1244 Kosovo is part of Serbia.Serbs in Bosnian War were also not defeated.Bosnian Serbs Army controlled more territory than Bosnian and Croatian Armies.NATO Bosnian Croat Army Croatian Army from Croatia and Bosniak Armies failed to defeat Bosnian Serbs in 1990s.
    Of course Author of this Article is Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty – an American propaganda old BS
    Radio Liberty should care more for American war crimes and American defeats in Korea Vietnam Iraq Afghanistan and Cuba.I can understand why Radio Liberty is a obsessed with Slobodan Milosevic , Milosevic back in 1999 during Kosovo War humiliated America and NATO.Incompetent American and NATO’s AirForces destroyed only 14 Serbian tanks during entire campaign

  5. Avatar 100% truth says:

    Radio Liberty is on Bosnian and Croatian side and against Serbs that’s more than obviously , but Bosnians and Croatians were during World War 2 enemies of the USA

  6. Avatar W8post says:

    I only can hope ‘they’ copy Slobodan’s trial as well….

    1. Avatar Vladimir Prita says:

      And what happened with Slobodan`s trial, pls tell us??
      He was charged and murdered, never convicted. But you “understood” he would be for sure. As well as you think Mr. Seselj is guilty spending 12y in prison without proper charges. Scandalous!

      1. Avatar W8post says:

        “The case of Vojislav Šešelj is a precedent on several grounds, and that precedent is still continuing. For the first time, the Trial Chamber initiated this kind of process and is creating the conditions under which a prisoner can be released, while that very prisoner does not want to be released,” said Ljajić.”

        you can find the complete files/process papers on GOOGLE!

      2. Avatar W8post says:

        here you can find the Seselj-case. >About the ICTY | The Cases | Legal Library <