A framework agreement on Greenland coordinated with US President Donald Trump will involve a significant strengthening of NATO security measures in the Arctic region. At the same time, these steps will not come at the expense of aid to Ukraine, which continues to require stable military support, Reuters reports.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte stated this during the annual World Economic Forum meeting in Davos. Earlier, he said Ukraine must remain the Alliance's priority.
Recently, US President Donald Trump claimed that Greenland is “unprotected” against a Russia–China threat and effectively demanded that the island be placed under US control.
First results expected in 2025–2026
According to Rutte, implementation of the new arrangements will not be delayed for years. Initial tangible results could appear as early as this year, with full decisions expected in early 2026.
"We will come together in NATO with our senior commanders to work out what is necessary," the Secretary General said.
At this stage, the key role will fall to the armed forces command structures of NATO member states, which are tasked with developing detailed requirements for enhanced Arctic security, taking into account new geopolitical realities and Russia’s increased military activity in the northern region.
Arctic security as a collective NATO responsibility
Rutte stressed that strengthening security in the Arctic is not the exclusive responsibility of Arctic states alone. He expressed confidence that NATO allies without direct Arctic borders will also contribute to collective defense efforts.
"I have no doubt we can do this quite fast. Certainly, I would hope for 2026, I hope even early in 2026," he added.
Talks continue, resources not discussed
The NATO Secretary General also clarified that during his personal meeting with Donald Trump in Davos, the issue of Greenland’s mineral resources was not raised.
Further discussions regarding the island’s status and security will take place directly among the US, Denmark, and Greenland, without NATO’s involvement in the political aspects of the process.
