Eng
Esp

Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

NYT: Limited Western backing forces Ukraine to search for Plan B

US deemed Zelenskyy’s victory plan unrealistic and too reliant on aid, while the list of targets in Russia exceeds available missiles, moreover, the plan’s secret point also seeks long-range Tomahawk missiles, “unfeasible request,” per US officials.
byYuri Zoria
30/10/2024
2 minute read
nyt limited western backing forces ukraine search plan b us' bgm-109 tomahawk missile flying november 2002 1118px-tomahawk_block_iv_cruise_missile_-crop
US’ BGM-109 Tomahawk missile flying in November 2002. Illustrative image: WIkimedia Commons
NYT: Limited Western backing forces Ukraine to search for Plan B

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s victory plan for Ukraine to win the war next year has received only “lukewarm rhetorical support” from Western allies, The New York Times reports.

No country has permitted the use of its missiles inside Russia, and an invitation to NATO remains off the table until the war ends, undermining two key points of the five-point plan, which also includes three secret annexes. Meanwhile, Kyiv faces growing challenges on the battlefield and in securing international support. Russia is advancing in the east, while American officials told NYT that Russia suffered its highest monthly casualties in September, with US and British military analysts estimating more than 1,200 casualties per day.

NYT says some military analysts and diplomats told the publication that the real audience for Zelenskyy’s plan might be Ukrainians.

“Mr. Zelenskyy can use his hard sell […] to show Ukrainians that he has done all he can, prepare them for the possibility that Ukraine might have to make a deal and give Ukrainians a convenient scapegoat: the West,” NYT wrote.

After weeks of lobbying his plan among Western leaders, the Ukrainian President has exhausted the possibilities, but at least he can say he’s tried, one of the NYT sources said.

“I’m not insisting that they do it exactly this way,” Zelenskyy said in a recent interview session with reporters. “I said it will work. If you have an alternative, then please, go ahead.”

According to NYT, US officials privately called Zelensky’s victory plan unrealistic and overly reliant on Western aid. Speaking anonymously about sensitive military details, one official cited a non-public proposal where Ukraine requested a “nonnuclear deterrence package” with Tomahawk missiles – a request deemed unfeasible. Tomahawks have a 1,500-mile range, over seven times that of ATACMS missiles sent to Ukraine, of which only a limited number were provided.

Kyiv previously provided Washington with a target list in side Russia, urging the US to lift its ban on striking Russia with its ATACMS missiles for Ukraine. However, the NYT says US officials claimed the list far exceeded the number of missiles available without risking stockpiles needed for potential conflicts in the Middle East and Asia.

Four US officials told The New York Times that Zelenskyy was shocked by Biden’s refusal to authorize using US long-range missiles during their September meeting, as Biden had previously relented on weapons like Abrams tanks, F-16s, and ATACMS. Despite detailed explanations and target lists, no political decision has been made.

NYT believes that NATO membership during the war remains unlikely, despite Ukraine’s aspirations. While Baltic nations and Poland appear open to the idea, the US and Germany oppose it, fearing direct conflict with nuclear-armed Russia.

Related:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts