Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Russian oil Turkey

Europe must clamp down on Russian oil flows through Türkiye

The Mediterranean country has become the world’s 2023 biggest buyer of Russian fossil fuels — and the #1 player in a EU oil-laundering scheme to bypass anti-Russia sanctions
A tanker with Russian crude in the Bosphorous. Photo: Claudio Ritossa
Europe must clamp down on Russian oil flows through Türkiye

To appreciate the booming trade in Russian fossil fuels, one need only go to a rooftop cafe along the Bosphorus. Back in March, while sipping tea on an Istanbul terrace, I watched as, over the course of two hours, at least four tankers – later identified through open-source marine-traffic websites – carried Russian crude and refined products through one of the world’s busiest shipping chokepoints.

A recent report by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) and the Center for the Study of Democracy (CSD), confirmed what I observed in Istanbul. Türkiye has facilitated the flow of Russian oil to the European Union since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, enabling the Kremlin to circumvent the bloc’s sanctions and prolonging the war.

In 2023, Türkiye became the world’s biggest buyer of Russian fossil fuels, importing around €42.2 billion ($45.9 billion) in oil, natural gas, and coal from the country – a fivefold increase over the past decade.

Despite the EU and G7 ban on Russian oil imports, European countries continue buying enormous amounts of crude and oil products from Türkiye. The CREA-CSD report found that between February 2023, when the EU ban and the G7 price cap on Russian refined petroleum products took effect, and February 2024, member states imported 5.16 million tons of oil products valued at €3.1 billion from three Turkish ports – Ceyhan, Marmara Ereğlisi, and Mersin.

Crucially, these ports have little or no refining operations and are heavily dependent on seaborne fossil fuels from Russia.

Over the same period, the EU’s total imports of oil products from Türkiye increased by 107% in volume year on year. Meanwhile, Türkiye’s total imports of oil products from Russia more than doubled in 2023, totaling €17.6 billion and generating an estimated €5.4 billion in tax revenue for the Kremlin’s war chest.

Considering the negligible increase in Türkiye’s domestic consumption of oil products, these findings strongly suggest that Turkish storage facilities are importing Russian fuel to resell to the West.

Given Türkiye’s strategic location and its relatively limited refining capacity, traders have traditionally found purchasing and storing oil products more lucrative than processing crude. And now that the war in Ukraine has increased energy prices, Russia enjoys elevated margins for every barrel it sells in the EU. Most of that profit is realized by trading intermediaries of major Russian oil companies that tend to be registered in tax havens such as Switzerland, the Netherlands, and the United Arab Emirates.

The Kremlin’s strategy of using Türkiye as a pit stop exploits a glaring loophole in the sanctions regime that allows blended Russian oil products to enter the EU.

According to official guidance, such products must be “substantially transformed” – not just relabeled – to be considered no longer of Russian origin. This suggests that traders in the EU may have breached sanctions when importing from Turkish ports refined petroleum products that were mixed with or consisted mainly of Russian oil.

The EU authorities should put an end to this oil-laundering scheme by strengthening sanctions enforcement. That means undertaking due diligence to determine the origin of oil products being imported from terminals that accept Russian oil.

Moreover, sanctioning countries must ban fossil-fuel imports from any storage facility that has received Russian oil products in the last six months to deter traders from exploiting this loophole.

The Office of Foreign Assets Control, the enforcement agency of the United States Treasury Department, must also impose penalties such as fines and asset freezes on shipping companies and entities that violate the current sanctions. Publicizing these penalties would likely deter others from engaging in similar trade.

The EU should also accelerate the criminalization of sanctions violations and operationalize common institutions for sanctions enforcement, such as the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the EU Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Authority.

More broadly, EU member states and G7 countries should accept that the current oil price cap is failing to restrict Russia’s access to financial resources. Contrary to the conventional thinking in the US and the EU, lowering the price cap would, in fact, be deflationary, as it would force Russia to produce and export more refined products to make up for the loss in revenue.

CREA estimates that lowering the price cap to $35 per barrel for premium products and $25 per barrel for low-value products would cut the Kremlin’s revenues from seaborne oil products by 68%, or around €3.3 billion per month.

Ultimately, the EU must fully wean itself off Russian oil and gas. It is the only way to unshackle the bloc from the grip of Russia’s state-capture networks, which continue to have a corrosive influence on the European economy and its politicians.

 

Martin Vladimirov is Director of the Energy and Climate Program at the Center for the Study of Democracy.

Editor’s note. The opinions expressed in our Opinion section belong to their authors. Euromaidan Press’ editorial team may or may not share them.

Submit an opinion to Euromaidan Press

Copyright: Project Syndicate. This article was published by Project Syndicate and has been republished by Euromaidan Press with permission.

Related:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!