“The focus on Russia’s alleged 'Nato expansion anxiety,' and attempts to appease it, ignore Russia’s genocidal propaganda and systematic war crimes in occupied territory of Ukraine, including massacres, mass rape, and torture,” the open letter reads.The letter also points out that while the recent NATO summit in Washington acknowledged Ukraine’s "irreversible path" to membership, it failed to establish a firm timeline for this to occur. The academics also argued that NATO’s reluctance to admit Ukraine only serves to empower Russia’s aggressive stance towards its neighbors.
“Russia’s actions demonstrate a clear intent to destroy Ukraine as a nation, rather than to alleviate its own security concerns,” they said.The scholars note that the fact is that Russia has not attacked a single NATO member, while it invaded non-member countries: Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. Signatories include academics from a diverse range of institutions, such as Dartmouth College, Indiana University, and the University of California, Berkeley. In total, the letter was signed by 158 academics from over a dozen countries. Earlier, a group of European and American academics has sparked controversy by urging NATO to reject Ukraine's membership bid, "drawing comparisons to Neville Chamberlain's appeasement of Nazi Germany." Related:
- Summit in Washington: Ukraine’s NATO dream deferred, but not dead
- NATO council: Ukraine to join when conditions met and allies agree
- Trump considers NATO deal with Putin, potentially to block Ukraine’s NATO accession
- “Collective Chamberlain” of scholars calls to appease Russia ahead of NATO summit
- Chairman Munich Security Conference: Only NATO membership will bring long-term peace to Ukraine
- Has appeasement won the Olympics?
- Putin likely to view West’s declarations about Ukraine as appeasement, as Hitler did their predecessors’ words about the Rhineland, Pastukhov says