Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Russia’s FSB, NSDC chiefs main ideologists of Ukraine war – The Times

Putin, Patrushev, Bortnikov. Collage by RFE/RL
Russia’s FSB, NSDC chiefs main ideologists of Ukraine war – The Times

The UK media The Times claims that the main initiators of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine were FSB head Aleksandr Bortnikov and chairman of the Security Council Nikolai Patrushev.

Having talked to insiders in the Russian government, the media reports that a four men played a central part in leading Russia to war — Putin and three siloviki: Patrushev (dubbed Putin’s gray cardinal), Bortnikov, and Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu.

Of the latter three, it was Patrushev and Bortnikov who were the prime political movers, Shoigu the sometimes hesitant executor,” The Times reports.

According to the sources, Patrushev and Bortnikov saw that Russian President Vladimir Putin is almost 70 years old and there will be no other such chance to persuade him to war.

At the same time, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, according to the newspaper, was somewhat hesitant about the need for an invasion.

By midsummer of 2021, a “critical mass” of opinion among the innermost circle of Putin’s friends and advisers had coalesced around the necessity of landing a “decisive military blow,” but it was unclear what form it could take, a Russian government official told The Times. By the end of the summer, the top siloviki had decided to invade, and all that remained was to persuade Putin to launch the operation.

Foreign Minister Lavrov was given the “final chance to make diplomacy work” in an ultimatum-like document published in December 2021 that demanded NATO retreat to its pre-2007 borders. British diplomats interpreted these outrageous demands not as an indication of how far the hawks in the Kremlin had moved away from compromise, but as a 00 sign that Putin would be able to settle for less.

Daily review: Russia publishes ultimatum rebuked by NATO, 33% Ukrainians ready to fight arms in hand, critical coal shortage reported by SBU

The precise plan of the invasion and its extent was kept secret even from all but Putin’s innermost circle of confidants: the majority of Putin’s Security Council were told of the coming strike at Kyiv and Kharkiv only after the fateful February 21 meeting of the Security Council.

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here


    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!