Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

President’s Office plans to falsify selection of anti-corruption prosecutor, watchdog claims

Vitaliy Shabunin, leader of the Anti-Corruption Action Center, says Ukraine’s Presidential Office is likely to falsify the results of a competition to the seat of the Head of the Specialized Anti-corruption Prosecutor
President’s Office plans to falsify selection of anti-corruption prosecutor, watchdog claims

The Kyiv-based Anti-Corruption Center, an anti-graft watchdog, says it has proof that the President’s Office plans to falsify the results of the selection process of Ukraine’s chief anti-corruption prosecutor who will lead the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office, or SAPO.

This comes after yet another delay of the commission that should select the SAPO head. On 2 December, the commission that was to finalize selecting the SAPO head did not convene as planned, leading to angry tweets from the G7 group of ambassadors to Ukraine.

One of the commission members Roman Kuybida posted on Facebook that it’s possible the meeting was canceled so that the world would not see the score results of the candidates for one of the stages of the competition — the practical task.

Four members of the 11-member commission appointed by the quota of the Council of the Prosecutors (the other seven are appointed by the Verkhovna Rada) decided to publish their results online; Kuybida posted the scores that they gave to the leading candidates.

The Anti-Corruption Action Center (AntAC), one of Ukraine’s key civil society anti-corruption institutions wrote on its website that the candidates took this practical test more than a month ago, on 28 October, yet the Prosecutor General’s Office has still not published the results.

AntAC stated that the instructions, together with the work of the finalists, were removed from the PGO website, yet were still available via the website’s google cache. These results were then given an independent assessment by the DEJURE Foundation, an NGO advocating for Ukraine’s judicial reform, and The Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.

The independent assessment of the results of the candidates for the practical test by these two institutions, conducted by a detailed methodology that rules out the possibility of too much subjectivity, is very close to the results of the four commission candidates that Kuybida posted online: they give more points to Oleksandr Klymenko, one of the two leaders of the competition.

Source: AntAC

AntAC leader Vitaliy Shabunin said that, according to the Center’s information, Oleg Tatarov, deputy head of the President’s Office, is preparing a “large-scale falsification of the scores” by members of the commission from the Parliament’s quota.

He claims that the possible falsification is taking place in order to not allow Klymenko, the leader of the competition, to win.

Oleksandr Klymenko is a detective of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau while his competitor Andriy Syniuk is a prosecutor in the Prosecutor General’s Office.

Andriy Syniuk was shortlisted as a candidate “unfit of chairing SAPO” by the Ukrainian media Ukrainska Pravda. The outlet noted it has “many questions” regarding the candidate’s lifestyle, including a possibly inappropriate declaration of assets and possible concealment of wealth.

The position of the head of SAPO, an institution created in 2015 as part of Ukraine’s new anti-corruption architecture, has been vacant since August 2020, when its head Nazar Kholodnytskyi resigned. An independent selection process to select a new SAPO head has been a crucial issue for Ukraine’s reform agenda, as well as its western partners.

Particularly, finishing this appointment before the start of December 2021 is one of the key requirements of the IMF’s agreement with Ukraine. Ukraine also promised in September 2021 to elect the head of the SAPO, as revealed in the joint statement after a meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Joe Biden.

However, the process was constantly delayed. The Anti-Corruption Prevention center claimed that on October 9, members of the commission “controlled by the President’s Office” had disrupted a key stage of the competition for SAP head. On the same day, President Zelenskyy stated he had not heard adequate explanations for this delay.



You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!