Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

The Kremlin could instantly end Europe’s gas crisis by restoring transit through Ukraine

Transport facilities of Ukraine’s Gas Transport System. Photo: Naftogaz (Illustrative photo)
The Kremlin could instantly end Europe’s gas crisis by restoring transit through Ukraine
Article by: Center for Strategic Communications and Information Security
Increasing gas supplies to Europe through Ukraine’s gas transmission system (GTS) could solve the European gas crisis, manifested by skyrocketing prices amid shortfalls in gas supply.

However, Russia deliberately shuns this option. In 2021, Russia dropped gas transit volumes through Ukraine thrice, from 186 mn m3/day to the current 109 mn m3/day. But the real volumes of transport are presently smaller than even this decreased ordered (and paid for) capacity, standing at 85.9 mn m3/day, according to the Head of Ukraine’s Gas Transport System Serhiy Makogon.

“If Gazprom returned to transit volumes of December 2020, the EU would start receiving an additional 100 million m3 per day, or almost 3 billion m3 per month. Obviously, increasing gas supplies to the EU is not part of Gazprom’s plans,” Makogon sums up.

The Kremlin justifies its decision by the presumed unreliability of Ukraine’s transport system. But in fact, Ukraine has heavily invested in its modernization, which cannot be said of Russia’s GTS. The only reason for Russia’s decreased gas transit is to blackmailing the EU to make operational the controversial Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

Europe is facing an unprecedented surge in natural gas prices, threatening a large-scale energy crisis. The targeted actions of Gazprom have caused this shortage of natural gas on the eve of winter: the Russian state concern thus puts pressure on Germany and the European Union to obtain a permit to start operation of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline as soon as possible.

And so, amid panic in the European market, when the price of a thousand cubic meters almost soared to an incredible $2,000, Putin held a meeting on “energy sector development.” For two hours, as reported by Kommersant, he “felt like the king of Europe.” The Kremlin has traditionally denied responsibility for the gas crisis.

According to a number of experts, the Russian state concern really did fulfill its contractual obligations to European clients. However, it did so by emptying its gas storage facilities in the EU. And at the same time, despite high demand and high prices, it did not book additional transit through Ukraine.

Russia does not explain why it won’t book additional capacity, writes Bloomberg. However, Amos Hochstein, a senior US State Department adviser for energy security, said it was a political move.

“The reality is there are pipelines with enough capacity through Ukraine to supply Europe. […] Russia has consistently said it has enough gas supply to be able to do so, so if that is true, then they should, and they should do it quickly through Ukraine,” said Hochstein.

According to Mikhail Krutikhin, a Russian economic analyst and oil and gas market specialist, “[Ukraine’s] pipeline capacity is enough to supply gas to two Europes.”

“When some expert starts telling you that Nord Stream 2 is meant for ‘new’ gas for Europe, you can stop listening right away. This expert is corrupt. Nord Stream 2 just circumvents transit from Ukraine at the Kremlin’s whim,” says Krutikhin.

Non-commercial behavior 

During the meeting, Putin did mention the possibility of increasing gas supplies through Ukraine’s GTS. But he objected to it, claiming it is unprofitable for Gazprom. Moreover, he alleged that the only reason Ukraine’s transit exists is because of his goodwill, while the Russian state concern is ready to give it up even at the risk of a fine.

This argument about unprofitability is a “blatant lie,” says Lana Zerkal, former Deputy Foreign Minister of Ukraine for European Integration (2014-2019). According to her, the Russian monopolist could be earning over $3 billion extra.

“Refusing this opportunity is another sign of non-commercial behaviour on the part of the monopolist and the use of gas as a geopolitical weapon,” said Zerkal.

Ukraine earmarked 1.5 billion euros for modernizing its GTS

Ukraine’s gas transport system. Photo:

Secondly, Putin continued, Ukraine’s GTS had allegedly “not been reconstructed or repaired for decades, something could burst there at any moment.”

The Center for Strategic Communication asked the Ministry of Energy of Ukraine to provide information on the real condition of the Ukrainian GTS.

“Incidents on the Ukrainian GTS have never led to the interruption of gas supply. It is one of the largest and most extensive gas transmission systems in Europe, and it allows for rapid manoeuvring of natural gas flows. On one of the gas pipelines/routes, the flows can be directed to another, while maintaining the obligations to supply natural gas at a specific exit point,” the Ministry of Energy said.

The Ministry also added that the absence of repairs and reconstructions on the Ukrainian GTS is “complete fiction.” The GTS operator strictly complies with all the necessary regulations, which determine the diagnostic measures and the number of repairs.

In addition, the Ukrainian GTS is implementing a large-scale modernization program: overhaul, technical re-equipment, reconstruction, construction. During 2021, seven facilities were commissioned, construction was completed and commissioning scheduled for four. Four more are under construction.

Reconstruction of eight compressor stations and almost 200 gas distribution stations is planned.

In just 8 months of this year, Ukraine invested UAH 4.6 billion ($175 million) into capital investments, repairs, maintenance, and diagnostics on its gas transport system.

The approved 10-year GTS Development Plan provides for about 1.5 billion euros of investment in technical upgrades of the gas transmission system.

Seven accidents on Russian GTS in 2021 alone

With such a reliable route for transporting gas to Europe through the territory of Ukraine, Gazprom’s underwater bypass pipelines cannot boast of the same flexibility. And in case of incidents/failures or repairs, their gas supply stops completely.

In addition, the condition of the ground infrastructure of the Russian gas transmission system is by no means better than the Ukrainian GTS. Both the operating time and technical indicators serve as proof for this. Especially problematic are the traditional transit corridors — Urengoy, Progress, Soyuz.

Over 2021, the Russian GTS suffered seven major accidents: the one on the Perm-Gorky-1 trunk pipe, the emergency situation on the Kachkanar branch, accidents on the Soyuz and Orenburg-Novopskov pipelines, fires at the Yubileyniy field, a branch to the Beloretsk gas distribution system, the Central Asia-Center 2 and Urengoy-Center 2 pipelines.

Serhii Makohon, head of Ukraine’s GTS Operator, believes that the Kremlin questions the technical state of the Ukrainian GTS to force the EU to certify Nord Stream 2 ASAP.

“Incident statistics suggest that our Russian colleagues should also increase investments in support of their own GTS. Nord Stream is only a small part of Russia’s GTS that needs daily attention. Therefore, money spent on the excessive Nord Stream 2 could have been spent on upgrading the Russian GTS,” says Makohon.

Just the beginning

Russia’s decision not to transit more gas through Ukraine has undoubtedly exacerbated the crisis in Europe, writes The Atlantic Council. Moscow’s position has sent shock waves across the continent.

But this is just the beginning. If the transit route through Ukraine stops, and Russian gas transit instead passes through Nord Stream and Turkish Stream without clear legal guarantees that these routes will not be used as tools of geopolitical coercion, Europe’s current energy crisis may only be a sign of more trouble to come.

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts