Copyright © 2021

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Belarusian transition more likely to follow Armenian rather than Ukrainian scenario, Lukyanov says

Police officers detain a protester during a rally in Minsk on June 19. Photo: Uladz Hrydzin (RFE/RL)
Belarusian transition more likely to follow Armenian rather than Ukrainian scenario, Lukyanov says
Article by: Paul A. Goble
After years of relative stability in the leaderships of the post-Soviet space, many have now gone through a change in the occupant of the top job. The scenarios ranged from violent ones like in Ukraine where there was a radical change of course to relatively peaceful ones like in Armenia where the changes have been less thoroughgoing.

According to Fyodor Lukyanov, the editor of Russia in Global Affairs and one of the most prominent foreign policy commentators in Moscow, the transition in Belarus might go in any of these directions but is most likely to follow the course seen in Armenia rather than that in Ukraine.

Lukashenka doesn’t have any plan to yield his position easily, and he has demonstrated for years that he is quite capable of maneuvering far more capably than many have thought possible even when he is in a tight situation, the commentator says. But this time may be different, although even now, the situation in Belarus has many unique features.

However, the things that make the transition situation in Belarus more like that in Armenia than in Ukraine are critical: First, Minsk like Yerevan really does not have any option but to maintain in the Russian sphere of influence. Second, the West is far less interested in and focused on Belarus than it was Ukraine and views Lukashenka with distaste.

And third, and this may be the most important factor of all, Lukyanov says, Belarus is both a sovereign state and part of the Russian-led Union state. For all of the Belarusian president’s complaints about Moscow and Putin, the Union state gives him certain advantages that his successors will likely want to take advantage of as well.

The real wild card in this situation, Lukyanov says, is Moscow. It is not simply that Lukashenka has annoyed Putin by his antics. Moscow has changed its approach to the former Soviet republics.  Influenced by Donald Trump’s mercantilism, the Kremlin sees ever less reason to view them as anything but foreign countries that either help or hurt Russia.

Obviously, Belarus is important for Russia geopolitically; but it will have to pay its own pay more than it does now. If Minsk leaders aren’t willing to do that, they are unlikely to find the kind of support they likely expect in the Russian capital, the Moscow foreign policy commentator concludes.

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Related Posts