Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Only 3% of Russians say they believe Moscow poisoned Skripal

Only 3% of Russians say they believe Moscow poisoned Skripal
Only 3% of Russians say they believe Moscow poisoned Skripal
Edited by: Yuri Zoria
The Russian smokescreen misinformation strategy of producing multiple conspiracies behind the Skripal poisoning case seems to be working. Only 3% of Russians believe that Russian intelligence services were those who attempted to assassinate ex-spy Skripal with a military-grade nerve agent on the British soil. The rest of Russians believe or at least just say they believe that Britain did it or “anyone” could do it.

Britain has charged two Russian military intelligence officers with poisoning former Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter, but only a fraction of Russians pin the blame on their country’s secret services.

poll by Russia’s independent Levada Center shows that 28 percent of Russians believe the Skripals were in fact poisoned by British intelligence services, with only 3 percent saying the attack was carried out by Russian intelligence services.

Another 56 percent of respondents said “it could have been anyone,” and 13 percent were unable to answer the question.

Sergei Skripal was found unconscious on a bench in the British city of Salisbury in March along with his daughter Yulia.

Skripal moved to Britain in 2010 after being released by Russia in the biggest spy swap since the end of the Cold War. He had been serving a 13-year prison sentence for spying for Britain.

In September, British prosecutors charged two Russian men with the attempted murder of Skripal and his daughter using Novichok, a military-grade nerve agent.

British Prime Minister Theresa May said the pair, believed to be officers in Russia’s GRU military intelligence service, had “almost certainly” acted with approval from “a senior level of the Russian state.”

Traces of Novichok were found in a London hotel room they stayed in before traveling to Salisbury.

Moscow has denied involvement and dismissed the case as an act of provocation against Russia.

The head of Russia’s foreign intelligence agency, Sergei Naryshkin, has accused Britain and the United States of being behind the poisoning.

And as demonstrated by the Levada poll, this narrative appears to have gained traction in Russia.

Russian media and officials have put forward a multitude of different narratives about the Skripal case, a well-honed disinformation tactic designed to confuse audiences.

Here you can find EUvsDisinfo’s timeline of the Russian disinformation campaign:

Click to unfold the timeline.

Click for full size

RFE/RL has also published a list of Russia’s “hodgepodge of theories, evasions, and refutations” on the case.


Further reading:

Edited by: Yuri Zoria
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here


    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!