Ukraine must deal with religious organizations using the laws it already has and pursue those who work against Ukraine “under the cover” of a religious organization,” the churchman says. And Ukraine must expose those who are doing so, a relatively small number but ones who are seeking “to subordinate the entire structure of the Moscow Patriarchate in Ukraine.”“I am absolutely convinced,” he says, “that the Moscow Patriarchate in Ukraine should not be prohibited. When fighting with a dragon, we must not become one, and when struggling with Russia, we must not become like Russia. This is complicated because it is always more difficult to do good than to do evil. But good is constructive while evil is only destructive.”
That mistaken action, the Ukrainian patriarchate official says, would allow the Kremlin “to set off a genuinely religious civil war,” to “set our democratic allies in Europe and America against us,” and thereby to “help the aggressor win. We must be wise and not allow such things to happen.”At the same time, Eustratius says, “it is very important that this church receives its correct name, that it be called the Moscow Patriarchate in Ukraine and not cover itself with the name of a Ukrainian church. Were Ukraine to proceed along the path of prohibiting an entire church, this would be a big gift to the Kremlin.”
Related:
- Russian court orders demolition of Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Kyiv Patriarchate) in Moscow Oblast
- Russification through the church
- Scholar: Russian Orthodox Church Moscow Patriarchate supports repressions, militarism
- Moscow Patriarchate still has more parishes in Ukraine than its Kyiv counterpart but fewer followers
- Moscow Patriarchate taking control over property of its parishes in Ukraine to block them from leaving
- How the Moscow Patriarchate is creating a separatist Lavra “republic” in Kyiv