Five reasons Putin has lost the younger generation forever

Police crackdown of the anti-corruption protests in Moscow, Russia on March 26, 2017


Analysis & Opinion, Politics, Russia

Igor Eidman

Igor Eidman

Kremlin propagandists suggest there were two basic reasons why so many young people took part in last Sunday’s anti-corruption demonstrations: supposedly, the organizers paid them and young people are easier to mislead. But Igor Eidman points to five more fundamental reasons why “Putin has lost the younger generation” now and forever.

  • First of all, the Russian commentator says, younger Russians “are a group in the population least affected by state television programming.” They watch television far less than their elders, and some of them do not watch television at all, preferring to rely on the Internet.
  • Second, younger Russians are more put off than their elders by the officious and bombastic official patriotism the Kremlin and its backers no often. They don’t accept the memes Putin offers as necessarily true because he offers them; they want to form their own views on the basis of their own experience.
  • Third, younger Russians are not burdened by “the weight of the negative experience of the past as are those in their 40s and 50s.” The latter suffered disappointment as a result of the unrealized promises of perestroika, but the former in most cases weren’t even alive when these promises were made. They are not as disillusioned because they haven’t been illusioned.Police crackdown of the anti-corruption protests in Moscow, Russia on March 26, 2017
  • Fourth, young Russians “didn’t take part in the division of property” after 1991, and they are put off by the emergence of two kinds of Russians, a hereditary wealthy set and an impoverished mass. That strikes them even more than their parents as fundamentally unjust and something that must be changed.
  • And fifth, young Russians like young people everywhere generally react negatively to efforts by their elders to impose the values of the latter on them. The more pressure the parental generation imposes, the sharper and more negative young people turn away from those ideas. As a result, “to protest against the regime is becoming fashionable.”

There are, of course, additional reasons that Eidman doesn’t mention including the calculation of at least some young Russians that a change in the national leadership might reduce the number of foreign conflicts Russia is involved with and thus their chances of being dispatched to and possibly being wounded or killed in such wars.



Edited by: A. N.

Since you’re here – we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away. But we’re here to stay, and will keep on providing quality, independent, open-access information on Ukrainian reforms, Russia’s hybrid war, human rights violations, political prisoners, Ukrainian history, and more. We are a non-profit, don’t have any political sponsors, and never will. If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation!

Tags: , , ,

  • Dirk Smith

    Once this last dinosaur of the Soviet Union destroys their economy and the lives of many young men, then perhaps third-world ruSSia can join the 21st Century.

    • Dagwood Bumstead

      I wonder when young Dwarfstanian men will start burning their draft cards in public en masse and chanting the Dwarfstanian equivalent of “Hell, no, we won’t go” when they are ordered to Syria and the Donbas, especially when the true extent of casualties among the Kolorads becomes known.

  • zorbatheturk

    Putin must go.

    • Dagwood Bumstead

      If the dwarf goes, he will probably be replaced with someone with a similar outlook. Rogozin, Medvedev, Lozhvrov and Co have stolen huge sums from the Dwarfstanian people and they will fight tooth and nail to retain their ill-gotten gains.

      • zorbatheturk

        Will Putin go quietly?

        • Dagwood Bumstead

          He may go quietly if he is offered a similar deal to the one Yeltsin was offered: leave office quietly and we won’t prosecute you for stealing huge sums from the State i.e. the people of Dwarfstan. After all, if the alternative is to have the book thrown at him and losing his “hard-earned” i.e. stolen cash and other loot plus a loooong sentence in a remote maximum security Siberian prison the choice won’t be difficult.

          But I suspect he will hang on until death. Stalin was 74 when he died, Brezhnev 75, Andropov 69 and Chernenko 73. So statistically speaking the dwarf, who is 64, has 11 years maximum left.

          • zorbatheturk

            Two more 6 year terms.