“In the 2000s, [he] denied in every possible way his territorial claims against Ukraine, declared that he respected the state borders and had no intention of taking Crimea, let alone by military means. Thus, what happened in 2014 was completely unexpected for the entire world.”

“In essence,” the historian continues, “Vladimir Putin today is counting on a similar fatalism on the part of the West. But one must not give him Crimea in order to ‘pacify’ him because then [his aggression] will never end. [Existing] international sanctions suggest that the West still is not inclined to repeat its earlier mistakes.”“They considered [it] as a means of pacifying Adolf Hitler. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain declared at the League of Nations that one must not encourage small countries with promises about their defense if in reality there are no such plans to provide it.”
Related:
- Chronology of the annexation of Crimea
- Putin's most likely next anschluss - a united Ossetia within the Russian Federation
- Umerov case highlights why Crimean Anschluss a threat to Russians, Portnikov says
- Putin's shell game with Crimea intended to cut importance and costs of the anschluss
- Crimean Anschluss opened way for justification of Stalin and Soviet system, Zubov says
- Crimean Anschluss, the October Revolution of today, will eventually be scorned as such
- Kyiv commentator: Putin's Crimean Anschluss is leading to Russia's suicide