In advance of the G-20 summit in China, both Moscow and Washington have sent powerful signals of their intentions. In hopes of forcing the West to put pressure on Kyiv and to cut back or lift sanctions on Russia, the Kremlin increased its military presence not only near the Ukrainian border but in Syria, Vitaly Portnikov says.
But those aggressive moves instead of intimidating the West have had exactly the opposite effect, the Ukrainian analyst says.
In a comment to Ukraine’s Gordon News Agency, Portnikov says explicitly that “the US has sent a signal that in principle Putin can lose control of his purse, Gazprom,” because the new sanctions the US is planning to counter Russian aggression will “seriously hurt this company and all its projects including those in Europe.”
That possibility, now very real thanks to the expansion of the sanctions regime announced by the US this week is something both Putin and those who want a more conciliatory policy toward Moscow “must take into consideration.”
Especially in their new format, when they will hit Russian firms as well as imports, “will inevitably achieve their goal” of forcing the regime to change course or to collapse. “After the destruction of the regime in Russia,” Portnikov continues, “Ukraine can play a significant role in the development of civil society in its neighbor.”
Related:
- Putin’s war games on Ukrainian border aimed at Western leaders above all, analysts say
- Putin’s Crimean miscalculation
- Three more danger signs regarding Putin’s intentions in Ukraine
- The Russian army mobilizes in all directions
- How Russia’s use of deniable assets bamboozled western security services
- Putin’s ‘International of Lies’ based on money, not ideas, Yakoveno says
