On 20 May 2015, Oleg Tsarev, leader of the "parliament" that unites the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk "People's republics" ("LNR" and "DNR") announced that project "Novorossiya" is closed. "We could not keep our people at the rallies, and our supporters in Odesa and Kharkiv rose up too soon," wrote Alexander Kofman, the "minister of foreign affairs" of the "Donetsk Republic", on his facebook. Numerous pro-Russian protests swept through Ukraine's south-eastern regions against Euromaidan's victory in late February 2014, but resulted in a "Novorossiya" much smaller than planned. We interviewed the witnesses of the post-Euromaidan pro-Russian unrest to understand why.
Mykolayiv separatist movement organized by local pro-Russian party with Russian money and actors





The protests were organized by the Russian Bloc party. Being a marginal political entity before Euromaidan, they suddenly started organizing demonstrations after the fugitive Ukrainian president Yanukovych fled the country. "They were transmitting the same official Russian propaganda word for word, about crucified soldiers and so on," Andriy recalls in the scorching south-Ukrainian sun outside Mykolaiv's Petro Mohyla University. "Our Security Services worked well; they worked to isolate the leaders, and the movement dwindled off. As soon as the bloc stopped going on the square with a loudspeaker, it all ended - because the pro-Russian people don't get organized by themselves, their Soviet thinking doesn't permit it. That's why Novorossiya didn't happen here, and we are very glad for that."Novorossiya didn't happen in Mykolayiv because the Russian security services didn't invest as many resources as in Crimea and Donbas, because Mykolayiv is too far away from Russia. And because the pro-Ukrainian Mykolayivans were stronger. Andriy Lokhmatov, journalist at prestupnosti.net
Kryvyi Rih: civic activists thwart plan of authorities to stage assault of local administration

Ultimately, why did Novorossiya not take root in Mykolayiv and Kryvyi Rih?
In both cases, self-organization of the population played a great role. People mobilized quickly to stop the threat and had the communication channels for this. Mykolayiv, being overall pretty passive with low attendance of pro-Euromaidan protests, managed to mobilize quickly when facing a real Russian threat and being fed up with the inaction of the local authorities. In Kryvyi Rih, an active organizer acted pre-emptively in a team with like-minded people on the basis of existing networks communication channels.This article is based on research that was conducted within the framework of the Summer School "Historicity and Post-Revolution - a Journalistic Retrospective in the Maidan Movement throughout the Country", organised by the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy and the Lectureship Program of the Robert-Bosch-Foundation in Kyiv. For more information about the project please visit this homepage and blog.