Nuclear-capable but carrying concrete: Expert explains Russia’s Oreshnik is psychological weapon, not military one

Lviv got the concrete.
The image shows a fragment of the Oreshnik missile in Lviv Oblast. Image by the Security Service of Ukraine
Nuclear-capable but carrying concrete: Expert explains Russia’s Oreshnik is psychological weapon, not military one

Russia may have modernized certain types of intercontinental ballistic missiles, says aviation expert Anatoly Khrapchinsky. However, the “Oreshnik” missile launched to strike Lviv Oblast, a region bordering NATO countries, was likely assembled from old Soviet components.

The Oreshnik strike took place just two days after Ukraine’s allies formalized their intentions on security guarantees in the Paris Declaration and conveyed the peace plan to Russian President Vladimir Putin. The US expected to receive an answer from Moscow on its acceptance. 

Why Russia warned the US about the missile launch

Khrapchinsky draws attention to a key point: Russia informed the US about the missile launch in advance. According to him, this is unusual for the use of conventional ballistic missiles.

“Because if Russia were using a regular ballistic missile, even medium-range, it would not notify the US that it was going to do so,” the expert emphasizes.

He adds that the day before the launch, Russia did indeed inform Washington, after which the American side issued warnings to its citizens about the threat in Ukraine. This confirms that the action was not just military but also a political message.

Attempted nuclear intimidation: "Oreshnik" as a carrier of fear, not advantage

The expert notes that the Kremlin’s main goal is to intimidate Europe with the possibility of further escalation, including the potential equipping of the missile with a nuclear warhead.

“Because, besides a nuclear warhead, this missile can carry only a concrete block which is essentially what we saw in Lviv or Dnipro,” Khrapchinsky explains.

For this reason, in his view, the “Oreshnik” is not a universal or "wonder weapon" but rather a tool of psychological pressure, intended to create fear rather than actually change the battlefield situation.

The myth of 13,000 km/h and the limits of real threat

Khrapchinsky also commented on widespread claims that the missile allegedly flew at 13,000 kilometers per hour. According to him, such figures, without clarification, are part of the information war.

This speed does not refer to the constant flight velocity but to the final phase of the ballistic trajectory, when the missile approaches the target at a steep angle.

“We quickly absorbed the information about 13,000 kilometers, but it must be understood that only due to the trajectory in the final stage could it reach such a speed,” the expert summarizes.

At the same time, he acknowledged that Ukraine currently lacks the means to intercept such missiles. However, their isolated use does not change the frontline situation and does not give Russia a decisive military advantage.

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Ads are disabled for Euromaidan patrons.

    Support us on Patreon for an ad-free experience.

    Already with us on Patreon?

    Enter the code you received on Patreon or by email to disable ads for 6 months

    Invalid code. Please try again

    Code successfully activated

    Ads will be hidden for 6 months.