Ukraine’s DARPA was supposed to exist since 2020. Its absence has caused Ukraine to fall behind Russia in technologies, says expert

No unified system means no coordinated progress.
ukraine funds 19 domestic missile developers peklo cruise missiles nineteen ukrainian companies have joined brave1 grant program focused weaponry development deputy prime minister innovation education science technology digital transformation mykhailo
Peklo drone-cruise missiles. Photo: Herman Smetanin
Ukraine’s DARPA was supposed to exist since 2020. Its absence has caused Ukraine to fall behind Russia in technologies, says expert

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's 2020 decree envisaged the creation of a Defense Technology Agency, similar to the US DARPA. However, the Cabinet of Ministers has yet to implement this decree, according to Valentyn Badrak, director of the Center for Army, Conversion, and Disarmament Studies, Espreso reports. 

According to him, the absence of a unified center has caused Ukraine to lag behind Russia in critical defense technologies.

“Bottom-up” initiatives and ministry efforts

Since the start of the full-scale war, various ministries and agencies, including:

  • Ministry of Digital Transformation
  • Security Service
  • Ukrainian Defense Intelligence
  • The State Special Communications Service have actively contributed to the development of defense technologies.

Some projects emerged as individual elements of the national system, while many solutions were proposed by “bottom-up” initiatives from enterprises.

Examples include: “Army of Drones,” which supplied drones to over 200 units, the state platform Brave1, and the Drone Hackathon competition, launched in 2023, allowing industry to work on a DARPA-like principle, says Badrak. 

Challenges and priorities for the future agency

However, due to the absence of a unified system, Ukraine's technical progress, the key to success against the adversary that is superior to the country's troop size, has not been perfect. 

According to Badrak main tasks of the new agency would include:

  • identifying priority weapon systems
  • unification and standardization
  • managing intellectual property
  • attracting public and private funds
  • securing foreign investments.

The expert emphasizes the importance of the human factor: the idea should be implemented by practitioners, such as Mykhailo Fedorov, who developed Brave1 and the hackathons, or an experienced professional from the defense industry. As Badrak notes, “personnel decide everything.”

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts

    Ads are disabled for Euromaidan patrons.

    Support us on Patreon for an ad-free experience.

    Already with us on Patreon?

    Enter the code you received on Patreon or by email to disable ads for 6 months

    Invalid code. Please try again

    Code successfully activated

    Ads will be hidden for 6 months.