Ukraine seeks Trump’s approval to buy US arms with $300 billion in frozen Russian assets

The request follows a Ramstein meeting where new US Defense Secretary Hegseth called Ukraine’s NATO membership ‘unrealistic.’
The White House in Washington DC, illustrative image: Wikimedia Commons.
The White House in Washington DC, illustrative image: Wikimedia Commons.
Ukraine seeks Trump’s approval to buy US arms with $300 billion in frozen Russian assets

Ukraine has asked the administration of US President Donald Trump to allow the use of $300 billion in frozen Russian assets to purchase American-made weapons, Bloomberg reports, citing European officials familiar with the matter.

This comes after the 12 February meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group in the Ramstein format, where new US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth did not announce weapons supplies for Ukrainian armed forces. Moreover, at the meeting, Hegseth declared Ukraine’s NATO membership and restoration of its pre-2014 borders “unrealistic,” which raises concern about how the country can defend itself against Russia in the future.

The proposal has been raised in recent weeks during meetings between Ukrainian representatives, some of its allies, and members of Trump’s team. One source claimed the idea was even presented directly to Trump, though “there is no indication the president supports” it.

The assets, belonging to Russia’s central bank, were frozen by the G7 and the EU following the beginning of its all-out war and are primarily held at Euroclear in Europe. So far, the G7 has only used the interest generated from these assets to provide Ukraine with $50 billion in loans.

During Joe Biden’s presidency, some European countries pushed for full confiscation of the assets. That discussion has resurfaced among Ukraine’s allies following Trump’s return, but key European nations remain divided. Germany, Luxembourg, and Belgium fear financial instability and legal risks, while some European officials suggest the assets could serve as leverage in potential Ukraine peace talks.

Ukrainian officials argue that economic and legal justifications exist for their request. They note that Trump has insisted Ukraine pay for any future US military aid—something these assets could facilitate while also benefiting American defense contractors. Additionally, legal experts suggest Russia’s frozen funds could be counted as compensation for war damages Moscow may eventually owe Ukraine.

Related:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here



    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts