

Putin personally commands child deportation machine
The findings reveal that Vladimir Putin personally directed the program of transferring Ukrainian children from its inception, orchestrating coordination between the Kremlin, the United Russia party, and occupation authorities in so-called Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics (DNR and LNR). At the heart of this operation is Maria Lvova-Belova, Putin's chosen executor for the entire program. Her involvement was comprehensive, ranging from coordinating with occupation authorities to personally accompanying children on military transport flights and conducting citizenship ceremonies. The scale of the operation became evident during the siege of Mariupol in 2022, when 31 Ukrainian children, aged 7 to 17, were taken from basements and transported on a plane from Putin's presidential fleet. In a symbolic gesture demonstrating her dedication to the program, Lvova-Belova adopted a 15-year-old boy from this group.
Russia's laws erase every link to Ukraine for displaced children
Upon arrival in Russia's Rostov and Kursk oblasts, Ukrainian children were placed under "temporary guardianship" – a designation that masked a systematic pipeline to permanent adoption by Russian families. This occurred despite most children having living parents and relatives in Ukraine, having been placed in institutions primarily due to family hardships. Russia's pre-2022 legal framework would have prevented this systematic transfer of children, as it required consent from both the child's legal representative and their home country's authorities for any adoption. This obstacle needed to be removed once Ukraine was designated an enemy state.
Russia forces Ukrainian children to become "Russian"
At least 67 identified children received Russian citizenship, with 13 being awarded Russian domestic passports in ceremonial presentations. This citizenship wasn't merely symbolic – it became a prerequisite for accessing essential services, including medical care and education. Yale researchers documented at least one case where a child was denied medical treatment until becoming a Russian citizen. The "re-education" component proved particularly disturbing. All eight facilities housing these children exposed them to pro-Russian propaganda, including military education, where children handled weapons and attended "military-patriotic" events. In Bashkortostan, a Russian republic, one program explicitly aimed to "cultivate a desire to be like strong Russian soldiers." Children handled military equipment and were recruited for cadet schools, with Russia's Investigative Committee creating a special "quota" for orphans.
The chaotic rush to place children with Russian families
Yale's Humanitarian Research Lab documented 166 Ukrainian children directly placed with Russian families across 16 regions following the full-scale invasion. Maria Lvova-Belova claimed 380 children were placed, suggesting Yale's verified 166 cases represent only a fraction of the total. The placement process revealed a stark contrast between careful planning and chaotic implementation. In Novosibirsk, one foster mother received just five days' notice before children from Luhansk arrived. Another family promised three girls and two boys but received four girls and one boy instead. In a particularly disturbing case, Moscow officials reportedly forced a woman to accept children despite her initial refusal due to health concerns. Misinformation plagued the process. Families frequently received incorrect details about the children, including undisclosed health needs. Some children endured multiple relocations, passing through three different regions before reaching their final placement.
Russia's actions meet definition of genocide
Under the Rome Statute, Russia's actions meet all five elements of war crimes. The program involved taking protected persons (Ukrainian children) during an armed conflict and moving them across borders without legitimate justification. While international law does allow for “evacuations” in some cases, there's a catch - you can't evacuate people from a crisis you created yourself. Furthermore, such evacuations must be temporary and preserve family unity – conditions Russia systematically violated. More critically, international law required Russia to return these children once fighting ceased and ensure they maintained their cultural identity. Instead, Russia implemented an aggressive "Russification" program and pursued permanent adoptions. The deportations relied on deception – children were misled about "excursions," forcibly separated from families, and placed in a system designed to erase their Ukrainian identity. Even parents who provided consent faced an impossible choice, pressured to choose between their children's safety and permanent separation.
- Systematic erasure of Ukrainian citizenship
- Forced Russian naturalization
- Mandatory "re-education" programs
- Prohibition of Ukrainian language and culture
- Placement with Russian families authorized to change children's identities
- Deliberate concealment of Ukrainian origins in databases.
Time is running out for bringing Ukrainian children home
The report also outlines five crucial steps needed to bring Ukrainian children home:- Russia must provide a complete register of all children in its custody
- Ukraine must create a framework for their return
- both countries must agree on the logistics
- Ukraine needs to determine what happens to children without guardians
- returned children must receive comprehensive support for reintegration.
- Over 3,000 children from occupied Kherson Oblast taken to remote areas of Russia for "re-education" – Ombudsman
- Russia plans to relocate 5,000 Ukrainian schoolchildren from occupied Luhansk Oblast
- Ukraine is searching for nearly 20,000 children deported by Russia; real numbers could be much higher
- US imposes sanctions on Russian officials involved in deportation of Ukrainian children