Copyright © 2024

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Ukrainian history gift to global history – Prof. Snyder

Global history makes much more sense with "hyper typical" Ukrainian history inside it - Prof. Snyder
Historian Timothy Snyder, Professor of History at Yale University. 13 October 2017, Vienna, Austria.
Ukrainian history gift to global history – Prof. Snyder
Edited by: Yuri Zoria; transcript by Olha Rudakevych
In his lecture “Ukrainian history as world history: 1917-2017” delivered at the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna on 13 October 2017, historian Timothy Snyder states, “What I have found in my own work is that Ukrainian history is a kind of gift to global history, that Ukrainian history in many ways is a missing link that makes certain trends in global history make more sense.”

Historically, Ukraine is not exceptional, but it is “hyper typical” of major trends in the last 100 years, states Snyder. He points out three moments of the 20th century and reveals how they are connected to Ukrainian history:

  • Ukraine’s failure to establish a nation-state after the First World War was actually typical of the European interwar national states, which all lasted for under 20 years.
  • From the perspective of Ukraine, the aspirations and the consequences of the neo-Imperial policies by Nazi Germany and the USSR come clearest.
  • If the true purpose of the EU is to rescue post-imperial states, then the Maidan Revolution makes perfect sense.

Ukraine between two neo-empires

It was Ukraine that was the linchpin in the creation of the USSR and it was Ukraine that was most problematic for the USSR. And both German and Russian neo-empires needed Ukraine, “the breadbasket of Europe.”

Map of Ukraine presented by the Ukrainian delegation at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919

Map of Ukraine presented by the Ukrainian delegation at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919.

After the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 in the old Russian Empire, the civil wars fought on the territory of the old Russian Empire were fought centrally in Ukraine.

“If you are a Soviet state builder, Ukraine is the major national problem that you are confronted with in the 1920’s,” states Professor Timothy Snyder. “If you are Stalin…Ukraine is a critical – if not the critical – place of revolution, where collectivization will fail or succeed,” Snyder goes on.

Ukraine is where the policies of Germany and Russia, the two neo-empires of the 1930’s-1940’s, coincided. To succeed, Germany and Russia both needed to have control of the grain stocks in Ukraine and to take possession of Ukraine’s fertile black earth.

For Ukraine, the encounter with the two new empires was especially disastrous. An estimated “3 to 4 million people starved between 1932-1933… another 3 million were killed during the German occupation of whom more than half were Jews, and another 3 million or so inhabitants of Soviet Ukraine died as Red Army soldiers. There is no event of this scale in any other country in the world,” Snyder claims. Ukrainians paid “a terrible, terrible price.”

Nation-states in Europe

The most important accident of European history in the 20th century, according to Snyder, is that the European land empires – Russian, German, Austro-Hungarian – collapsed after the First World War, while the maritime empires – French, British, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese – survived the WWI, but they broke up after the Second World War.

The short existence of the post-imperial nation-states in Europe was a rule.

According to Snyder, Europe never had any nation states. There were empires and then the collapse of empires, followed by a bailout integration project, the European Union.

In Eastern Europe, there were nation-states, they just didn’t last long. “And if you look at it from your national point of view, you don’t draw any lessons, you just say you didn’t last long because the outsiders were evil, but if nobody lasted for long it can’t just be that the outsiders are evil, it has to be a systemic problem. East Europeans, by not considering it in a systemic way, are making a big mistake,” says Snyder.

February 1918 article from The New York Times showing a map of the Russian Imperial territories claimed by Ukraine People's Republic at the time, before the annexation of the Austro-Hungarian lands of the West Ukrainian People's Republic. Source:

February 1918 article from The New York Times showing a map of the Russian Imperial territories claimed by Ukraine People’s Republic at the time, before the annexation of the Austro-Hungarian lands of the West Ukrainian People’s Republic. Source:

The first European nation-states such as Serbia, Greece, Bulgaria emerged in the late 19th century in the Balkans as a result of the anti-colonial movements against the Ottoman Empire. After the First World War, the political philosophy of the independent nation-states extended to much of Eastern Europe so new states were created out of the territories of the former European land empires. All such nation-states failed fast, they existed from a few years like Ukrainian and West-Ukrainian National Republics, up to 20 years like other new post-war states such as Austria, Czechoslovakia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia.

History amply demonstrates that nation-states always fail, Snyder continues. The West-Ukrainian National Republic and the Ukrainian National Republic that existed between 1918 and 1922 are “hyper typical” examples.

“History is…a horizontal process in which there are connections that we see if we look horizontally…rather than just looking up and down a national narrative,” he continues.

Snyder posits that “nation states can challenge an empire, they can even bring down an empire but they are incapable of providing an automatic replacement.”

Ukraine and EU

Professor Snyder thinks that the most interesting achievement of the European Union is that it manages to bring together post-imperial states. In that sense, the European Union is not really the settlement to the Second World War as it is believed. The EU is the settlement to WWI because what it does is brings the doomed nation-states created after the First World War together with the states that were still maritime empires after the WWI.

If the true purpose of the EU is to provide aid and support to the European state, then the Euromaidan protests in Kyiv made perfect sense, Snyder goes on. Turning to the EU for help, the Maidan expressed what Ukraine was looking for: “Ukraine has a problem with the rule of law, and that is the essential problem of state building. [We] could use a little help from the outside…we’re hopeful that the Association Agreement with the EU will be a push in the right direction.”

“Global history only makes sense if we’re able to look both at Europe and beyond Europe at the same time…the convenient division between Europe and beyond Europe actually prevents us from seeing the things that are essential to Europe itself…to Europe’s great peril at this particular moment… Ukraine is so intensely typical, it is the place that allows us to see the general phenomenon whether it’s nations or empires, whether it’s the creation of new empires in Europe or whether it’s a European rescue of a nation-state,” told Snyder.

If the European Union is to survive, it must continue to “rescue [new] states…. once it stops rescuing states it will also stop rescuing the states that are its members.”

From the point of view of Russia, “the war in Ukraine is just a part of a larger anti-European turn…if you’re Moscow and you’ve drawn the conclusion that you can’t join Europe…then Europe can’t be allowed to exist in its present form. If Europe rescued other nation states [by incorporating them into the European Union – Ed] so that they are richer and freer than your state, that cannot be allowed to continue.”

Read also: War against Ukraine is part of Russian policy to break EU apart, says historian Timothy Snyder

Read also:


Edited by: Yuri Zoria; transcript by Olha Rudakevych
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here

    Will the West continue to support Ukraine?
    • Know what moves the world.
    • Stay informed with Kompreno.
    • Get quality journalism from across Europe.
    Special discount
    for Euromaidan Press readers
    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!

    Related Posts