“We could have taken more time to organize the referendum and invited more observers to Crimea. They’re asking us why WE did it in one week. We answer that there was a direct military threat; bandits and criminals were arriving in trains, armed to the teeth and firmly set on rooting out Russian troops. You may want to cling to some legal, technical aspects concerning the situation, but you can’t deny referendum results.”Few people paid have paid attention to this statement, but it proves a point. The Russian “Ribbentrop” has implicitly confirmed that in spring 2014 Moscow organized some kind of “referendum” on the territory of a neighbouring country, and justified the annexation of Crimea through “referendum results”. There cannot be any other interpretations! Thank you, Mr. Lavrov, this is just another piece of evidence for the future international trial of the Kremlin clan. Moscow backs itself into a corner Moscow feels that it has to systematically justify its annexation of the Crimea. Russian diplomats, officials and politicians are trying to prove to themselves and to the world that Crimea is now a “legitimate Russian territory”. They understand that their ploy about “unity” was so obviously ridiculous that Moscow has backed itself into a corner. Kyiv and the West do not recognize the annexation; Russia is referred to as a thief; Putin has been asked many times to return the peninsula to Ukraine. The Kremlin has become a global pariah, and that is annoying Lavrov and Putin. They are well aware that this can have serious consequences. If you don’t believe it, just read the biography of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and Libyan dictator Muammar Kadaffi. Lavrov has repeatedly stated that there is no “Munich conspiracy” between Moscow and Washington over Crimea. The immediate reason which prompted Lavrov to accept the interview was a recent European Parliament resolution on occupied Crimea. Once again, Moscow’s face was rubbed in the dirt. Brussels called on Moscow to return the peninsula, adding that sanctions against Russia would be enforced until the last Russian soldier left Ukrainian territory. Such a document won’t make the Kremlin budge, but it’s essential for further discussion within the European Union. It’s well known that the Kremlin’s secret supporters have been working tirelessly for more than a year, trying to persuade European politicians to soften their position on sanctions and the “Russian status” of Crimea. It seemed to be working fine until the summer of 2014, but the MH-17 crash confused the whole issue.
