During this year, Russia's Dossier Center collected information about the structure, personnel, methods of work, and the main stages of development of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB). Open sources, information from databases, documents, materials from criminal and civil cases, photographic evidence, and audio recordings were studied. Dozens of experts were interviewed, including direct participants in the described events, former and current employees of the FSB.
In a series of publications, Euromaidan Press publishes translations and summaries from Dossier Center reports and investigations. The reports describe the rebirth of the FSB from a state organization that had to ensure the security of society to a semi-criminal structure that has appropriated the functions of a "second government" and is invading all spheres of public and state life.
"State security agencies have always been an instrument of the supreme power of the existing political regime… [In the 1990s] the security services stopped monitoring latent processes in the socio-political and ethnonational areas. Which was a mistake. The current rampant terrorism in the country is one of the consequences of this,"said Nikolai Patrushev, former FSB director, Putin’s right hand, and since 2008 secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, already in 2002.

- Read also: FSB tortures detainees in occupied Crimea as law enforcement goes Soviet-style, UN report confirms
FSB is a de facto successor of Soviet KGB, history, symbolism, and personnel prove
The de jure continuity between the secret services was broken. In the early 1990s, there was an attempt to reform the KGB that was no longer needed in its old form after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the creation of the Russian Federation. However, already in January 1992, President Yeltsin attempted to establish the Russian Ministry of Security and Internal Affairs as a single superdepartment. That decision demonstrated Kremlin's intention to rely on the strengthening of the secret services and the old power of Soviet security services in a difficult socio-economic situation. On 12 April 1995, Yeltsin officially created the FSB. It gained power similar to that of the KGB. Unlike the KGB, the modern Russian secret service was not engaged in foreign intelligence and protection of the country's leadership. At the same time, the FSB gradually restored and intensified the structures of the "political investigation", which resulted in the creation of a department for the protection of the constitutional order and terrorism prevention -- FSB's second department that is behind the majority of political repressions. Instead of steps to completely abolish the old state security agencies and create fundamentally new Russian special services under the control of parliament and civil society, the country's leadership took a number of partly correct but one-legged measures to cut some departments of the KGB, and they proved insufficient. Already in the first months of the existence of the independent Russian Federation, the highest positions in its special services were occupied by people from the Soviet KGB and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, who demonstrated loyalty to the President of Russia.



Of course, the contemporary FSB, as a post-modern version of KGB, has considerable differences.
In particular, in the age of “the end of ideologies,'' ideology is officially declared a personal issue of FSB employees. And the logic of the market has deeply penetrated FSB.
FSB – the same Soviet KGB with personal instead of ideological motivation
The general level of repressions in modern Russia remains significantly lower than it was in the USSR. Nevertheless, repressions against members of the political and business elite approach that of the Stalinist period.That means that with much smaller resources, the FSB achieves the same chilling effect as the KGB, targeting key figures of business and political opposition to the regime.
One of the paradoxes of the revolutionary changes of 1990-1991 was that the abolition of the Communist Party supervision of state security agencies made them potentially even more dangerous to the democratic foundations of the state.
FSB – a KGB for business
The other transformation of the 1990s is that FSB, unlike the KGB, obtained the opportunity to actively intervene in the economy and reap significant benefits. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, tens of thousands of not-dismissed members of Russia's special services continued to have at their disposal, albeit temporarily, an unbalanced but powerful apparatus of violence. The state, which was in deep crisis in the early 1990s, in turn, was unable to maintain a decent standard of living for security personnel, and often simply could not provide them with a living wage. In such circumstances, the temptation to use force for personal purposes was extremely great. From the other side, private business suffered from criminal lawlessness, urgently needed protection, and had sufficient means to pay for that protection. Under these conditions, the inevitable commercialization and criminalization of the service began. In particular, this process was headed by KGB and then FSB colonel Vladimir Putin in Sankt-Petersburg. It was this city that in the 1990s served as a small test-version of what in the 2000s would finally become an FSB-controlled Russian Federation.