Taking autocephaly away from Moscow would be a “nuclear option” and it very unlikely; but Constantinople has the power to take that step. More immediately, Job pointed out, it has the option of granting autocephaly not only to Ukraine but also to Orthodoxy in Belarus, something that would further limit Moscow’s influence especially now that it has lost Ukraine. Moscow is clearly losing this church battle, something that will have serious consequences for Patriarch Kirill in the first instance – he could even be forced from office – but also for his church and for the Russian state it serves. Constantinople isn’t intimidated, and Moscow religious and secular has to decide just how far it will go given that the stakes against it are becoming so large.“We hope that Russia will reflect upon this and return to unity with the Universal throne for the Universal throne does not want to break relations with it. But if this situation will continue for a long time, of course, the Universal throne will be forced to take definite decisions in order to guarantee the unity of the church,” Job says.
Further Reading:
- The next domino – Belarusian Orthodox hope for autocephaly
- Moscow having failed to block Ukrainian autocephaly now attempting to exploit it
- Tomos ante portas: a short guide to Ukrainian church independence
- Constantinople could grant autocephaly to Belarusian Orthodox Church next, Gorbik says
- Constantinople moves to grant autocephaly to Ukrainian Church, outraging Moscow
- Three signs Moscow Patriarch Kirill knows he’s lost on Ukrainian autocephaly
- Ecumenical Patriarch to grant Ukrainian Orthodox autocephaly, Greek Church source says
- Waiting for Constantinople’s historical decision on Church autocephaly in Ukraine
- Implicitly conceding Ukrainian autocephaly, Moscow makes plans to split Orthodoxy and dominate one part of it, analysts say
- Ukrainian autocephaly just as inevitable as restoration of USSR is impossible
- Inside Ukraine’s appeal for Church autocephaly