
(Image: krynica.info)
A second aspect of these exercises that shows they are not joint in any real sense is that the Belarusian portion is only a small part of a much larger exercise involving Russian forces in the Russian Federation and in international waters. Minsk wasn’t involved in planning these and so would have had minimal input into even the part on its territory. Indeed, Sivitsky says,Therefore, if these exercises are to be as close as possible to reality, they would have to function under a Russian chain of command, not some joint one.
Russian defense planning would never be willing to offer Minsk a voice in this not only because that would undermine the shape of the total exercise but also because Moscow inevitably views Belarus as the site of potential clashes with the enemy and thus would not want Minsk to limit what Russian forces might do.

Such a message, Sivitsky says, is clearly Moscow’s message. It is hardly one that Minsk would have been a co-participant in defining. Thus, it is important not to call Zapad-2017 a joint exercise because in reality it is a Russian one that is making use of some Belarusian units but not allowing them the kind of voice the term “joint exercise” suggests.this exercise is about sending the West a message concerning Moscow’s willingness to escalate its military operations in the event of a further deterioration of relations between the Russian Federation, on the one hand, and NATO and the US in particular, on the other.
Related:
- “Zapad-2017”: Russian sabre rattling towards Eastern Europe
- Military expert Starykov: Zapad-2017 war games in Belarus designed to demonstrate Russia’s military power
- Zapad-2017: military games with an unpredictable ending
- Is Lukashenka worried about the loyalty of the Belarusian siloviki?
- Russian-speaking Belarusians and Ukrainians threaten Putin’s ‘Russian world’ and Russia itself
- Under our noses, Russia has geared up for a western offensive