Copyright © 2024 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Russia accountable for 72% of foreign disinformation operations: study

At Ekaterinburg, Russia. Source: ICDS.EE
Russia accountable for 72% of foreign disinformation operations: study

Diego Martin and Jacob Shapiro have analyzed 53 foreign influence efforts (FIE) which targeted 24 different countries from 2013 through 2018 in their report “Trends in Online Foreign Influence Efforts” published by Princeton’s Empirical Studies of Conflict Center. The authors have found that Russia accounts for 72% of such foreign influence operations around the world.

As the paper highlights, information and communications technologies (ICTs) have created novel opportunities for foreign governments to use social media to influence politics in a range of countries by promoting propaganda, advocating controversial viewpoints, and spreading disinformation.

The report describes a new database of foreign influence operations (FIEs) defined as coordinated campaigns by one state to impact one or more specific aspects of politics in another state, through media channels, including social media, by producing content designed to appear indigenous to the target state.

Defined as an attacker-target-political goal triple, an alleged FIE had to meet all three criteria. For example, the Russian campaign to polarize American politics was distinct from the one intended to discredit conservative critics of President Trump.

Unlike traditional information operations when state-supported media promote specific narratives, foreign influence operations disguise the origin of the content.

The subject to analysis were more than 460 media reports in which the researchers were able to identify FIEs, track their progress, and classify their features.

The authors discovered 53 of such foreign influence efforts (FIEs) which took place in 2013-2018 and targeted 24 different countries around the world. Two of the cases were ongoing as of April 2019, including Russia undermining the Belarus government, and Russia working to reduce support for the Donbas conflict among Ukrainian citizens.

“The objective of such campaigns can be quite broad and to date have included influencing political decisions by shaping election outcomes at various levels, shifting the political agenda on topics ranging from health to security, and encouraging political polarization,” the abstract reads.

The researchers found that Russia conducted 72% of the influence campaigns, while China, Iran, and Saudi Arabia accounted for most of the remainder. In five cases, the origin of the campaigns was not clear.
Source: “Trends in Online Foreign Influence Efforts” by Diego Martin and Jacob Shapiro.

More than 40 additional cases in research met some but not all criteria of the influence operations. In 2016, for example, pro-Kremlin and Russian state-funded media wrote negative stories against NATO’s operation in Estonia, but this distinct information operation didn’t fall under the FIE definition because the content was not meant to appear as though it were produced in Estonia.

According to the paper, the 53 foreign operations since 2013 targeted 24 countries:

  • 38% targeted the US;
  • 9% Great Britain;
  • 6% Germany;
  • Australia, France, Netherlands, and Ukraine 4% each;
  • Austria, Belarus, Brazil, Canada, Finland, Israel, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Spain, South Africa, South Saudi, Sweden, Taiwan, and Yemen received each being targeted once.

The first FIE in the authors’ database occurred in 2013 when Russian trolls launched a campaign to discredit Ukraine in the Polish Internet space.

 

Having analyzed the strategies and tactics used in the operations, actors and platforms involved, the authors conclude, “While Russia has been the most active user of this new form of statecraft, other countries are following suit. Iran and China have deployed similar tactics beyond their own borders and even democratic states such as Mexico have adapted these techniques for internal purposes.”

The full report is available on the website of Princeton’s Empirical Studies of Conflict Project (ESOC).


Read also:

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here


    Will the West continue to support Ukraine?
    • Know what moves the world.
    • Stay informed with Kompreno.
    • Get quality journalism from across Europe.
    Special discount
    for Euromaidan Press readers
    Euromaidan Press

    We are an independent media outlet that relies solely on advertising revenue to sustain itself. We do not endorse or promote any products or services for financial gain. Therefore, we kindly ask for your support by disabling your ad blocker. Your assistance helps us continue providing quality content. Thank you!