Copyright © 2021 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Terrorist war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine: The Eastern Front as of September 1

Terrorist war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine: The Eastern Front as of September 1
By Roman Burko

Foreword

Due to objective reasons, we were forced to make an operational pause in posting information and analytical materials regarding the course of “Anti-Terrorist Operation in Donbas.” Beginning August 21, we started referring to things as they are, namely: TERRORIST WAR OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AGAINST UKRAINE.

We believe that, after a week of radio silence from our end, those who found our summaries and projections way too skeptical and improbable have become far less ardent. The likelihood of a strike in the direction of Mariupol; the accumulation of heavy machinery by Russian fighters in order to breakthrough along the key directions outlined in our previous materials; and the entrapment of Ukrainian troops as a result of either malicious or unintentional disregard of the need to bring up reinforcement (of course, assuming such a possibility existed) – all of this was mentioned in our publications on multiple occasions over the past month. This ship has sailed, as the saying goes, and there is no need to stir up the past. As is traditional, the relevant authoritative individuals should busy themselves with rewarding those who were not involved and condemning those who are innocent.

Also, in order to avoid any rumors and allegations that, by marking both parties to the conflict on situation maps, we get in the way of Ukrainian troops’ “covert” fight against the enemy, we have decided, as an experiment, to mark in red on the map only the enemy’s position, along with his projected strikes and maneuvers. This is certainly a serious drawback to visualization, but one can go to great lengths for the Motherland’s good. If only this would help, since the tendency to classify everything and to keep quiet about the actions of incompetent officials is starting to resemble the Soviet approach, where you classify everything that was messed up and eliminate any witnesses. But let’s put the lyrics aside. We won’t be criticizing or scolding anyone, nor will we blaming anything on the foolishness/treachery/obtuseness by certain individuals of responsibility. This turned out to be ineffective and, unfortunately, leads to no positive results. We also leave open the possibility that, perhaps, we are unable to observe all of the cause-and-effect relationships from our end. We will therefore try to optimize our work, to preserve its relevance and interest for our readers. Keep your powder dry. Glory to Ukraine!

The course of military operations

A number of stereotypes have fallen to pieces since our last summary. Those who claimed that Putin will not be openly invading Ukraine, but will instead continue sponsoring Donbas terrorists, while the ATO forces will continue slowly pushing the insurgents out and encircling them, had come head to head with yet another fatal error. Exactly as stated in our previous attempted warnings, the enemy started carrying out his plans for a full-scale operation in the south of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts. In doing so, the Russian insurgents managed to introduce significant forces through a Marynivka border checkpoint (Luhansk oblast) and to let them pass south along the border to the town of Markivka, near Novoazovsk. What followed was a direct outcome of a clearly planned operation by the Main Intelligence Department of the General Staff of the Russian Federation.

Following several days of fighting, the Ukrainian forces withdrew from the town of Novoazovsk. Troops were diverted in the direction of Mariupol. Mariupol is now getting ready for defense. Volunteers monitoring the enemy’s Zello radio channels inform that there are now reports of Russian diversionary reconnaissance groups (DRG) stationed in Mariupol itself, and that these will attempt to destabilize the internal situation within the city in a synchronized manner in the event of an external assault by the enemy’s principal forces. Reports are coming in about the shelling of the M14 route and the ingress of the Russian troops towards Yalta (marked as DRG actions on the map). It is possible that the enemy will soon bring up additional reinforcement into this area.

Such a breakthrough in the southern direction has enabled the Russians to completely cut off the Amvrosiivka and the Starobesheve groupings of the ATO forces, which resulted in two pockets (both marked on the map symbolically, to avoid revealing the exact position). The latest reports indicate that our troops are trying to break out from the Starobesheve entrapment. As for the Amvrosiivka pocket, it is located in the deep rear of the enemy’s forces, and we hope it will be possible to resolve the situation favorably for the guys that remain there. Strikes on Volnovakha are expected in the nearest future. Incidentally, it turns out that a recent report of intercepted information on the Russian troops’ planned strikes in the areas of Kurakhovo, Fashiivka, etc. was not disinformation at all; this can already be regarded as an accomplished fact.

The Lutuhyne grouping of the forces failed to accomplish its mission without supplies. It will probably return to the main forces. As for the Luhansk airport, our troops were forced to retreat in the afternoon; thankfully, there were no casualties. Consideration should now be given to the destruction of the runway; otherwise, the airport could become a base for the enemy’s aviation, which is unacceptable. This is especially so in light of a recent report of the Russian aviation’s airstrike against the ATO positions in the area of Shchastia. Additionally, taking into account the accumulation of the enemy’s major attack forces in that area, the loss of Shchastia will open up the way to Novoaidar for Russian troops, and from there – to Starobilsk…

Debaltsevo has also come under a real threat, due to the ATO forces being pushed out from the southern districts, as well as due to the ongoing attempts to take over the Donetsk airport. In the event of it being seized, we could expect the movement of the enemy’s forces from Horlivka in the direction of the village of Myronivskyi and from the direction of Pervomaisk-Stakhanov-Brianka. This could result in yet another entrapment and the rapid seizure of Artemivsk. As far as the Lysychansk-Rubizhne-Sievierodonetsk triangle is concerned, the Russian insurgents won’t be in any rush there…

As described, the situation plainly demonstrates that we are almost fully transitioning from the elements of an anti-terrorist operation to an open positional war. This calls for a change in the operation’s command, since it shifts from an ATO into a military realm entirely; thus, the fronts should be under the command of experienced military specialists.

I realize that the news are far from rosy. Of course, there are instances of heroism, as well as of successful destruction of enemy machinery and weapons of the Russian aggressors. However, we are considering global changes, a shifting front line, and completed – as well as projected – strikes by the enemy. It is impossible to cover all of the directions, but the key is to avoid getting depressed; this is the last thing we would expect of our friends and readers. It is also crucial to make efforts, to the extent of one’s abilities, towards our common victory – while preserving complete confidence and faith in our common cause. The role that you take on in this struggle is irrelevant; everyone chooses the burden of responsibility that he/she is capable of carrying. The key is to remember that any, even at first seemingly minor, work could become that very drop that will finally wear away the heavy stone of the common misfortune that befall our Ukrainian land. After all, there’s no coincidence behind the theory that even a butterfly flapping its wing could cause a typhoon at the opposite end of the world

[hr]Source: informnapalm.org, translated by Olga Ruda, edited by Alya Shandra

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here


    Related Posts

    February 14: Russia’s aggression in Ukraine is part of a broader, and more dangerous, confrontation with the West

    February 14 – Prosecutor General of Ukraine in cooperation with Security Service of Ukraine has detained a former Chief of the Party of Regions Oleksandr Yefremov, – said Prosecutor General of Ukraine Viktor Shokin in his comment to Internet media "Ukrainska Pravda".

    February 14 – At 0:00 the Armed Forces of Ukraine will cease fire along the contact line, – stated the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko during his address from the General Staff on February 14th.

    February 14 – President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko has said that peace agreements are in jeopardy as a result of the situation at Debaltseve lodgement. "The whole world is waiting tensely for tomorrow's morning with bated breath. Those who would like to derail the peace process at its outset, have been warned about the consequences. I am not going to say what Ukraine will do if the peace process is disrupted. I will say one thing – we will not turn another cheek if we are provoked and may the Lord forgive me for that", – said Poroshenko.

    February 14 – Battalion Donbas soldiers captured 17 fighters in the area of the village Lohvyn in Donetsk region.

    February 14 On February 14, terrorists are preparing a massive provocation, which may result in the entry of armed forces from RF. This was aired on Channel 5 by the spokesman of Sector M, Dmytro Chalyj. And they did accomplish this – they shelled with Hrads the Russian territory. Now Russia will blame the Ukrainian side for this.

    February 14 In the internet there appeared a video which testifies to the gathering of armored artillery by the Russian side from Crimea to the administrative border with Ukraine.

    February 14 – As a result of constant artillery shelling of Debaltsev by the fighters, "the city is burning", the building of the city police was hit directly by Hrad units. This was stated by the Head of the Regional Headquarters of MVS in Donetsk region, Viacheslav Abroskin.

    February 13 – 11 Ukrainian military were killed and 40 injured in the ATO area in the last 24 hours, – NSDC spokesman Andriy Lysenko.

    February 13 – According to new Minsk agreements, the city of Debaltseve should remain under Ukraine's control. However, Russian terrorists were given an order to gain control over the cities of Debaltseve and Mariupol by February 15th, – informed Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine Petro Mekhed: "According to information available and taking into account the fact that there has been an agreement to cease fire on February 15th (0:00), Russian troops and pro-Russian militants were ordered to occupy Debaltseve and Mariupol".

    February 13 – Soldiers of 79th brigade of Ukrainian army have detained a terrorist "Gnom" ("Dwarf") who is allegedly second in command at the detachment of Russian terrorists named "Somali". He personally participated in torturing Ukrainian military prisoners.

    February 13 – A tank battle for the village of Shyrokine and an artillery battle for the village of Stakhanka have taken place – both are located close to Mariupol, – reports Ukrainian regiment "Azov".

    February 13 – When the terrorists were shelling the town of Shchastya (Luhansk region), they killed and injured civilians at a local café.

    February 13 – Right wing party "Pravyi Sektor" believes that that any agreements with separatists are unconstitutional and thus the party reserves its right to active military operations, – stated party leader Dmytro Yarosh.

    February 13 – Russian terrorists have shelled the city of Artemivsk, which is located behind the combat line protected by Ukrainian forces.

    February 13 – 4 people were killed and 16 injured as a result of shelling by Russian terrorists at the city of Hirnyk (Donetsk oblast).

    February 13 – US Senate has passed a resolution on the release of Ukrainian pilot and member of Ukrainian Parliament Nadiya Savchenko.

    February 13 – In the last hours before the beginning of the ceasefire, foreseen by the mutual agreements in Minsk, the danger of bloodshed only increases. This was stated by the German official Gernot Erler, an advisor to Merkel on Russia, reported the Bayerischer Rundfunk: "The risk is truly very high. In the last hours before the ceasefire, there exists the danger that the sides will attempt to increase losses among each other," he said. According to him, the heightening may lead to the reality that the readiness for a ceasefire will dwindle to nothing. "There is a diffference between Minsk-1 and Minsk-2. I see more concrete definitions in the new agreement. Also, backing up the new document are three preidents and a chancellor," noted the politician.

    What Russia wants:From cold war to hot war

    Russia's aggression in Ukraine is part of a broader, and more dangerous, confrontation with the West

    Marco Bojcun: MINSK II: Land for a ceasefare, but not for pease

    Lithuania's view on Minsk2

    Putin's war on the West

    Flawed deal in Minsk

    Polish view on Minsk2

    Ukraine's other war – on corruption (NATO Review)

    Lilia Shevcova: The Kremlin Is Winning

    By Taras Kuzio

    What will the west do when Minsk-2 unravels?


    European leaders desperate to avoid going down an Iranian-style route of economic and financial sanctions and to dissuade the US from sending weapons signed a second agreement to end the fighting in Ukraine on Thursday in the Belarus capital, Minsk. But it will be as unworkable as the first Minsk agreement signed in September 2014. The new agreement has weaknesses similar to those of its predecessor and will unravel in the next few months.

    How will the weak Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) go about removing foreign troops and mercenaries? Will Russia really permit Ukraine to take control of its border next year, after local elections in March and the adoption of a new Ukrainian constitution that outlines some form regional devolution to the Donbas?

    Indeed, could elections ever be considered free and far if they are held under the barrel of a gun? With crime rampant in the separatist-controlled Donbas, will it be safe to transfer funds for social payments and pensions from Kiev to the region and for taxes to be transferred back to the central government?

    The reaction from leaders in the region was sceptical or cautious at best. Dalia Grybauskaitė, Lithuania's president, said Minsk-2 was a "weak" document; Bronisław Komorowski, Poland's president, said peace was still a faraway goal.

    The main reason Minsk-2 will not hold is that the person who began the conflict – Russian President Vladimir Putin – has not achieved his strategic goal of destroying Ukraine as an independent state. Western sanctions have not served as a deterrent.

    As Andrey Illarionov, a former economic adviser to Putin, reminded us this week:

    the goal of Putin's war against Ukraine is an attempt at the inclusion of it, Belarus, and also Russian-speaking enclaves in other countries in some kind of geopolitical union called 'the Russian world,' with the liquidation or at least the limitation of their sovereignty.

    The Donbas conflict will only end, he argues, if Putin gives up "the policy of denying the statehood, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine and other states with Russian or Russian speaking population".

    Putin has always confused Russian speakers in Ukraine with Russians, and has talked of "17m Russians" living in Ukraine. That this is a misnomer can be seen from the weak support for separatism in the six Russian-speaking regions of eastern and southern Ukraine outside the Donbas.

    US and EU leaders are unwilling to face the implications of a return to the Europe of the 1930s, with one country seeking to destroy another. They are desperate to put off the inevitable confrontation with Russia through negotiation. A year ago, when former US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton made an analogy between Nazi Germany and Putin's Russia defending their co-ethnics in other countries, she was ridiculed. But today, her critics agree with her.

    Putin's demand for Ukraine to become a federal state is a non-starter. It has no support among the Ukrainian public or its elites and is an attempt at 'Bosnianising' the country. No federal country in the world gives its provinces a veto over foreign and defence policy, as Putin is insisting the Donbas must be given in Ukraine.

    Putin's objective to install a pro-Russian leader, parliament and government presupposes the annulling of presidential and parliamentary elections held in May and October of last year that were recognised as free and fair by the OSCE, the Council of Europe and the EU. No sovereign country in the world would accept such a demand from its neighbour.

    Putin's paranoia about Nato and EU enlargement into what he views as Russia's 'zone of privileged interests' is a misnomer. Although an April 2008 Nato summit in Bucharest named Ukraine and Georgia as future members, France and Germany have said they would veto this. The EU has never offered membership to Ukraine.

    And who will persuade the Ukrainian parliament to overturn a December vote by a constitutional majority of 302 to move away from the non-bloc status that Putin wants Ukraine to return to?

    When Minsk-2 unravels, what will US and EU leaders do next?

    Ukraine will not agree to a Minsk-3. If Russia and the separatists again fail to implement the agreement, the only options open will be to remove Russia from the Swift international payments system, blacklist its president, prime minister and its foreign and defence ministers, and supply Ukraine with defensive military equipment, training and satellite intelligence.

    You can't make the same mistake twice. The second time you make it, it's no longer a mistake. It's a choice.

    Taras Kuzio is a research associate at the Centre for Political and Regional Studies, Canadian Institute for Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta and non-resident fellow at the Center for Transatlantic Relations, School of Advanced International Relations, Johns Hopkins University.

    P.S.: Please spread this appeal as much as possible.