Copyright © 2021 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Anti-Terrorist Operation in Ukraine: summary for August 14, 2014

Anti-Terrorist Operation in Ukraine: summary for August 14, 2014
By Roman Burko

The past day was marked not only by a number of wins but by losses of previously liberated territories. The dynamics of events changes very quickly and we cannot redraw the map every minute or every hour; moreover, that even does not make sense if settlements change hands very often. That is why if we do not change the borders on the map and only show directions of attacks, this means it makes sense. If the situation does not change drastically, the map of the territories controlled by terrorists may start to grow tomorrow. For now we do not make any significant changes to the borders.

We have to admit that the terrorist managed to regain control over Marynivka village (Donetsk region). This scenario was predicted in our previous summaries: we showed directions of possible attacks from Antratsyt and Kutbyshevo. Of course, the militants would be unable to complete their maneuvers and attacks successfully if the Russian Federation did not help them. This can lead to complete encirclement of the forces in Miusynsk. Given that Fashchivka is no longer controlled by the ATO forces, the consequences could be disastrous.

Our group also predicts the beginning of the active actions by terrorists in the area of Uspenka, Vasylivka and Kumachove. It is most likely that the militants are preparing a corridor to Donetsk; the possible direction is Donetsk – Starobesheve – Kumachove – Berestove. By the way, there is a good road connecting Berestove with the Russian Federation. This can be evidenced with a “flickering” DNR checkpoint in Hlynka village (Donetsk region) and the attack with MRLS BM-21 “Grad” from the direction of Berestove on one of the ATO groups located near Starobesheve. It is not clear yet for what purposed the corridor is going to be used: for withdrawal or for reinforcements.

According to the preliminary information the ATO forces have captured Olkhovatka (Donetsk region); this brought them close to the thruway between Horlivka and Donetsk via Yenakijevo. However, it seems like the militants expected the Ukrainian forces from the east because they delivered preceding artillery blows towards Panteleimonivka.

As for Horlivka itself, there were fights in the south of the city in the area of Ozeryanivka village. Moreover, in the evening we received information that the ATO artillery successfully hit the new headquarters of the terrorist in the area of Horlivka. Recall that the old headquarters located in the building of the Department for Combat Organized Crime was destroyed earlier.

After the unsuccessful attack on Ilovaisk the ATO forces had to withdraw to regroup and then closer to the evening began to develop the offensive on Mospyne, The terrorists continue to shell Mospyne, toughen the restrictions for the curfew and chase spotters. It is possible that they will try to counter-attack on Panteleimonivka via Popasna; Panteleimonvika will then also be attacked from Horlivka. The possibility of the attack is very high; yesterday the terrorists in Donetsk got reinforcements totaling up to one tank company. Besides, they may attack towards Starobesheve to consolidate progress achieved with MRLSes.

The terrorists continue to counter-attack towards Popasna. Today such an attack was successfully suppressed with tank fire of the ATO forces. The fire caused significant losses among the terrorists. It is safe to say that the ATO forces are getting closer and closer to Pervomaisk.

It is most likely that all attacks by the terrorists towards Popasna are none other than an attempt to regain control over the town with subsequent access to Debaltseve.

It should also be noted that there is no interaction between the gangs of the terrorists – just like there is no interaction between various uniformed services of the ATO forces. This is the reason why they failed to agree on counter-offensive actions. Besides, the increased activity of the ATO forces to regain the control over the region makes terrorists break up their reserves in different directions.

The ATO forces reported that they had captured Novosvetlivka and entrenched there. The fights for Khryashchuvate still continue. The position of the ATO forces in that area is extremely unstable.

To summarize, for the past day the terrorists managed to expand the southern corridor; the ATO forces achieved success in the area of Horlivka, Donetsk and the Luhansk region. However, the probability of attacks on the directions predicted yesterday remains high.

It should be noted that there are many militants imitating civilians in the liberated cities. Those militants gather information about the actions of the Ukrainian uniformed services. For example, they watch the airfield in Luhansk, the activity of the militants is also observed in Sloviansk.

The question of humanitarian assistance to Ukrainian citizens living in Donbas has finally got off the ground. Over the past day the convoy of 70 trucks with Ukrainian humanitarian aid was sent from Kyiv, Kharkiv and Dnepropetrovsk to the Luhansk region. According to several sources the Russian convoy of “humanitarian Trojan horses” was observed in the border area near BCP Izvaryne. The convoy does not dare enter Ukraine but recall that the area near Izvaryne is controlled by the terrorists.

Together we will stand, together we will win! Glory to Ukraine!

[hr]Source: burkonews.info

You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here


    Related Posts

    March 5: Moscow will not support the mission of peacekeeping forces to Ukraine

    March 5 – 1 Ukrainian military was killed and 1 wounded in Donbas in the last 24 hours, – informed acting spokesman of the General Staff of Ukrainian Armed Forces Vladyslav Seleznyov.

    March 5 – In Crimea, Russian authorities are questioning the participants of the II All-Crimean Conference of the Committee on protecting the rights of Crimean Tatar people, – informed on his Facebook page Committee Chairman and Majlis member, Eskender Bariev.

    March 5 – "Authorities" of the occupied Crimea have refused to investigate the murder of Crimean Tatar Mr.Ametov. They have killed Crimean Tatars in the past and will continue killing them in the future.

    March 5 – Nadiya Savchenko, who was on hunger strike for 83 days, has agreed to stop. "I am learning to change my tactics. Yes, physically I feel lousy, but not bad enough to have to die right now. So for some time I will be drinking broth – if I have to live, I will fly, if I have to die, I will die healthy", – she wrote.

    March 5 – Moscow will not support the mission of peacekeeping forces to Ukraine, if such a proposal is submitted to UN Security Council, – said Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov

    March 5 – The number of cases of unjustified detention of citizens of Ukraine has increased in Russia, – statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine

    March 5 – "Large numbers" of Russian soldiers are dying in eastern Ukraine, where for almost a year pro-Russian separatists have been fighting against the Ukrainian government, – stated NATO Deputy Secretary General of NATO Alexander Vershbow, reports Agence France Presse.

    March 5 – In Luhansk oblast Ukrainian Armed Forces have withdrawn its rocket and artillery batteries according to Minsk agreements (including multiple rocket launcher systems BM-21 "Grad").

    March 5 – RF President Volodymyr Putin wants to destroy NATO. This was stated by the Commander of U.S. Ground Forces in Europe, General-Lieutenant Ben Hodges, reports The Telegraph. "I am convinced that Putin wants to detroy our alliance, not by attacking it but by splitting it up," he noted. Hodges also commented that Russia may attempt to to destabilize one of the members of NATO by the use of partisans or other forms of 'hybrid war'. He also urged that American tanks be placed in countries along the eastern wing of NATO, in terms of stopping that factor for Putin. Specifically, according to Hodges, he proposed to place tanks in Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Rumania, and Bulgaria.

    La Fondation Robert Schuman – Russia, Ukraine and International Law

    P.S.: Please spread this appeal as much as possible.

    February 12: ”Normandy Four” negotiations concluded in Minsk with a disappointing result for Ukraine

    February 12 – "Normandy Four" negotiations concluded in Minsk with a disappointing result for Ukraine. Putin did not give in on a single point – there will be no withdrawal of Russian troops (they are, of course, nowhere close to Ukraine), no immediate resumption of control over the border, no reinstatement of sovereignty over occupied Crimea or Donbas. There are, however, the obligations on behalf of Ukraine to service social needs of separatists, legalize their armed gangs and hold fake elections under their watchful eye. The situation looks a lot like the surrender of Sudetenland (Czechoslovakia) to Hitler.

    February 12 – Total financial assistance to Ukraine from the IMF and other organizations could amount to 40 billion dollars over 4 years, – said IMF's Managing Director Christine Lagarde.

    February 12 – Russian Ministry for Emergency Situations has announced the preparations for the 14th so-called humanitarian aid convoy destined for Donbas – more weapons will be transported, no doubt.

    February 12 – Russia has transferred another lot of military equipment and artillery to the territory of Ukraine, controlled by militants – approximately 50 tanks, 40 "Grad", "Uragan" and "Smerch" multiple rocket launch systems and 40 armored vehicles crossed Russian-Ukrainian border at border crossing point Izvaryne, – said NSDC spokesman Andriy Lysenko.

    February 12 – The transfer of the amphibious assault ship "Vladivostok" (Mistral-class) to Russia could begin as early as next week.

    February 12 – EU High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy Federica Mogherini does not expect sanctions against Russia to be discussed during the summit of EU member-states leaders to be held on Thursday.

    February 12 – Secretary General of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Lamberto Zannier hassaid that at present it is impossible to determine whether the militants in Donbas are also soldiers of the regular Russian army. OSCE has completely exhausted itself as a security-oriented organization.

    February 12 – Agreements reached in Minsk during the meeting of the leaders of the countries of the "Normandy quartet" are absolutely weak. This was stated by the President of Lithuania, Dalia Grybaskaite, to journalists in Brussels before the EU Summit. "The fundamental part of the resolution is the control of the borders. It was not agreed upon and not resolved," she noted. "This means that the border is open for crossing by whatever soldiers and whatever artillery," remarked Grybaskaite. "This means that the resolution is totally weak," emphasized the President of Lithuania. She is also not very optimistic about the agreements on the cease-fire.

    "Five months ago we already had one agreement about a cease-fire which was not implemented. Let's see what happens with this one," underlined Grybaskaite. "We will observe in the next few days how at least these partial agreements will be implemented," she added.

    War is hell! (photo report from occupied Vuhlehirsk)

    Russia lies... great start to Minsk agreement (Savchenko cannot be released!!)

    Timothy Ash

    Ukraine – deal thoughts


    I guess with hindsight, a deal was always going to be done. Merkel was not going to get on a flight to Minsk, after Kyiv, Moscow, and Berlin, and not get something. And Putin needed to try and rebuild some bridges with Merkel, after seemingly upsetting her at Brisbane. Merkel is probably the honest broker in all this. She really feels for the Ukrainian position, but understands the real threat from Russia – she reads Putin better than any other Western leader, and cannot be bought. But it is Bismark-style real politik for Merkel, and she was desperate to stop the fighting – almost at any cost, which is entirely understandable. Hollande will likely get his aircraft carriers delivered, and sees all this as offering the hope of ressurection in terms of his presidency at home – a global leader, strutting the international stage and making Cameron, et al look like poodles, or rather a bulldog with no teeth. Putin gets his aircraft carriers, which will no doubt have a nice shiny berth now awaiting in Sebastopol. Putin also fended off near term threats of sanctions from the West, and can sell himself to allies in Europe (there are many) as a peacemaker – again heading off further sanctions threats. He has also not agreed to very much, as I don't think his signature is on the document, so if it fails (and it likely will) he can blame others. He has also headed off the threat of the US arming Ukraine – and therein he is in cahoots with Obama himself, who will see this deal as being useful in fending off calls from the DC consensus (including within his own administration) now to arm Ukraine – and can return to his own "splendid isolation" or "strategic patience" as it is now called stateside. That's a nice term for doing as little as possible. Poroshenko gets his IMF programme, and can try and roll out reforms attached to this to try and assure the supporters of Maydan that this team is really the Real Deal in terms of the reforms they so desire. Note the IMF press release was timed for 10am, just as news of the Minsk deal broke – so my sense is that someone was telling the Ukrainians that an IMF deal was contingent on a Minsk ceasefire deal. No ceasefire – no IMF deal. And the IMF gets to roll out its new programme, which it has been working on for months. Poroshenko probably also thinks that the ceasefire will buy time for Ukraine to regroup, rearm against the clear and present danger of further Russian intervention. But will it all stick/last? I just do not think so, as I still fail to see from this deal what is different to Minsk I in terms of delivery on Russian strategic objectives in Ukraine. Minsk I clearly did not deliver for Russia, hence that ceasefire did not last long, so let's see what is really different this time around. The issues of real autonomy/federalism, and border control don't appear to be properly addressed in this document. Constitutional reform towards the Russian agenda will be impossible for Poroshenko to deliver. And finally and fundamentally why I do not think that the status quo is sustainable – one year ago Russia felt the need to annex Crimea, and intervene in eastern Ukraine. But one year ago Ukraine was no threat to Russia as a) it was non aligned; b) popular support for Nato membership was low single digits, and there was little support in parliament or amongst political elites to drive Ukraine NATO membership. C) the west really did not want Ukraine in NATO as they saw this as a red rag to the Russian bull, and as events have proved could not defend Ukraine under NATO's TOR; c) the Ukrainian military had limited fighting capability as was proven in the early days of the conflict, but subsequently changed; d) the govt in Kyiv was weak and disarray and the Ukrainian economy on the brink of collapse; e) and as events have proven Russia had de facto control of Crimea via the stationing of 26,000 troops and the long term BSF agreement. And f) and finally Ukrainians were not anti-russian or even particularly anti-Putin. If Moscow was not a real threat a year ago, but Moscow felt compelled to intervene, look at the risk from a Russian perspective now from Ukraine – a) Ukraine is no longer non aligned. B) it now wants to join NATO and opinion polls now show majority support for this. C) Ukraine is rebuilding military capability and the military doctrine is now against the threat from Russia; d) Ukraine has a reform admin in Kyiv, which has a real chance of succeeding now with imf support. It can offer a rival and successful model of development to Putin's power vertical and sovereign democracy. E) Opinion polls show strong ukrainian opposition/distaste for the Putin regime. So, net-net the above still suggests the risk of further future Russian intervention in Ukraine.

    P.S.: Please spread this appeal as much as possible.