Moscow supports Northern peoples in ways designed to cost them their way of life and identity, Horyevoy says

The Ukrainian journalist who specializes on religious and ethnic questions presents a damning portrait of what the Russian government has been doing to the peoples of the North and Far East, thereby extending Ukrainian concern from the largest national minorities in the Russian Federation to the smallest.

What Moscow is doing in the Far North is another manifestation of its “colonial policy which in Russia is conducted under the slogan of ‘the national idea of the ingathering of lands’” and “has led to the destruction of the indigenous population of a large number of regions.” But nowhere worse than in the North.

That region has 85 percent of Russia’s gas and 15 percent of its oil, and Moscow has extracted these natural resources in a way that has been destroying six percent of the pasture and hunting lands of the indigenous populations, increasingly leaving them without the ability to carry on their traditional way of life, Horyevoy continues.

But that is only one and not the worst aspect of Russian policy there.

On the one hand, it has promoted the spread of high levels of alcohol consumption from the Russian to the non-Russian communities, thus leading to the degradation of both. And on the other, it has set up a system in which members of the indigenous people must make a Hobson’s choice.

In order to get the benefits which Moscow promises to the indigenous populations in the shape of greater hunting and fishing rights, members of these groups must forego the benefits of modernity; but if they try to continue their way of life at odds with the interests of oil and gas companies, they will be declared extremist and lose their membership in these ethnic groups.

Moscow simultaneously supports both.

It has systematically reduced the share of the populations of these communities getting benefits while at the same time reducing their number by declaring members of these groups who don’t practice the traditional ways Moscow in fact opposes no longer part of these communities.

The combination of these two drives, both of which are managed by the Russian FSB, works to Moscow’s benefit but only at the cost of the rapid destruction of these ethnic communities, their way of life and their identities, an obvious violation of the human rights of these peoples, the Ukrainian journalist continues.

Read More:

• Indigenous leader accuses Russia of ethnocide at UN Forum
• Moscow’s efforts to Russianize non-Russians will lead to demise of Russian nation and Russian state, Gyylman says
• As long as Russia remains an empire, Moscow will be repressive at home and aggressive abroad, Eidman says
• Moscow’s effort to isolate Finno-Ugric peoples in Russia from Finno-Ugric world proves less than fully successful
• Moscow hides its effort to weaken its larger non-Russian nations by playing up its support for smaller ones
• Putin unintentionally highlights that Russia’s war on Ukraine is both ancient and fateful, Inozemtsev says
• On historical unity in a prison of nations: Ukraine’s Institute of National Remembrance Head strikes back at Putin
• Global warming already having ‘explosive’ consequences in Russian North
• Moscow’s false story about Alaska infuriates residents of Russian North
• ‘Russia may cut itself off completely from the West,’ Sergey Medvedev says
• Russia still hiding Stalin’s genocidal crimes against Finns and Norwegians after 80 years
• Circassians and their fate: introduction into history of nation expelled by Russian Empire from Caucasus
• Moscow outraged by calls to remove statues of Russian colonizer in Alaska