Copyright © 2021 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Russia ‘a failed state’ because it doesn’t enforce its own laws, Shtepa says

The text in Russian says: "A citizen of Russia. Hired by Russian Government with Russian money. Wearing Russian camouflage. In front of Russian military equipment. With Russian weapons in his hands. Gives a Russian TV channel and a Russian journalist an interview about a "civil war in Ukraine." WTF?! (Image: rufabula.com)
The text in Russian says: “A citizen of Russia. Hired by Russian Government with Russian money. Wearing Russian camouflage. In front of Russian military equipment. With Russian weapons in his hands. Gives a Russian TV channel and a Russian journalist an interview about a “civil war in Ukraine.” WTF?! (Image: rufabula.com)
Edited by: A. N.

Few concepts are more often misunderstood than that of “a failed state.” Such a state is not one on which there are no powerful institutions, but rather it is one in which there is no central authority which exercises control over actions on all of its territory and which at least tries to enforce its own laws on the population.

Tragically, there are more failed states around than many would like to admit; and one of them may very well be the Russian Federation. In a brief comment today, Russian regionalist Vadim Shtepa says that it is “a failed state” because laws inscribed in its own criminal code are not enforced.

Specifically, he says, Moscow shows little or no interest in enforcing Paragraph 353 of Section 34 of that code. That provision specifies that anyone who “plans, prepares, unleashes or conducts an aggressive war is subject to imprisonment for a period of seven to fifteen years.” And anyone who “engages in a war of aggression faces the loss of freedom for ten to 20 years.

[quote]Such legal provisions may seem meaningless to many. After all, no one is likely to bring Vladimir Putin to justice for his violations of this paragraph. But they are not unimportant because they can become the basis for soldiers and others to refuse to obey illegal orders to engage in such actions.[/quote]

And that could become increasingly significant if more soldiers leave their posts as some have already in order to avoid being sent to Ukraine. On that, see “Russian soldiers increasingly fleeing their units to avoid being sent to fight in Ukraine” of July 11, 2015.

For more general problem of Russia as a failed state, see “Russia’s aggression now reflects RSFSR’s past failure to become a state, Portnikov says,” March 18, 2015, and this author’s “Russia as a Failed State,” Baltic Defense Review, 12:2 (2004).

Edited by: A. N.
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!
Total
0
Shares
Related Posts