18 of 20 Ukraine’s ministers now speak English, up from two in Yanukovich regime

Ukrainians on the Maidan protesting the criminal and oppressive regime of Yanukovich, 2014

Maidan became our life 


Sometimes a simple statistic can highlight a fundamental change, and that is true of one from Ukraine. At present, 18 of 20 of the ministers in the Ukrainian government speak English, up from only two of 20 under Viktor Yanukovych, Vitaly Sych, the editor of “Novoye vremya” points out.

And that shift reflects broader changes in the politics and society of that country means, he argues, that “Ukraine has a historic chance” to transform itself into a European country “if it survives the war on the Eastern front” Moscow has imposed upon it.

Of course, precisely because of what this change would mean for Europe and Eurasia if it is completed, the Russia of Vladimir Putin is likely to do anything and everything to make sure that Ukraine not only cannot complete that change to a better life but that Kyiv is forced to return to a Russian-centric past.

In a speech to an Aspen Institute meeting in Berlin, Sych described the events of the past year and a half which he says have led to a “moment of truth” for Ukraine and for more than Ukraine as well.

The Ukrainian editor began his remarks by saying that “the lives of many Ukrainians switched into emergency mode on Dec.1, 2013. That day special police units beat up students who protested in the Maidan, Kiev’s main square, against ex-President Viktor Yanukovych’s decision not to sign an association agreement with the EU.

“Ukrainian television channels aired footage of police brutally beating up young girls and boys who were peacefully protesting on Maidan,” he continued. “The students were bleeding and shouting, some of them managed to escape only when they got inside the nearby churches. The next day a crowd of 100,000 outraged Ukrainians poured into Kiev’s streets.”

Their “protest was no longer about European integration—it was about justice and dignity. People demanded an apology and a punishment for those responsible for beating the protesters,” he said. But instead of apologizing, “Yanukovych responded with repressions turning a spontaneous protest into a marathon stand-off.”

Sych told the meeting that it was obvious to him at the time that “if we allow this to happen, we will turn into a bad version of Belarus for decades. There would be no elections in Ukraine, no economic competition, not even personal freedoms. We wouldn’t even get what I call a ‘freedoms in exchange for food’ pact.”

Yanukovych then “flooded the city with armed thugs brought from all over Ukraine to intimidate the protesters. Some of the activists … went missing.” Others were killed, and still others targeted. “Nobody knew who was going to be next.”

“A few days afterwards what was already called a Revolution of Dignity,” Sych said, “culminated in an ugly way. Special troops shot dead about 100 people right in the center of the capital, Yanukovych fled Kiev. Parliament cancelled the dictatorial laws. The next morning Yanukovych’s mansion … a symbol of corruption, opened its doors to general public.”

“The trouble seemed to be over. But it had just began,” Sych continued.

“A few weeks afterward Russia annexed Crimea and riots began in Eastern Ukraine. Armed people started capturing government buildings in Donetsk and Luhansk, some of them Russians, some of them locals. What was happening in Kiev was grim but was clear. The developments in the Crimea and Eastern Ukraine were beyond my understanding.”

“We suddenly realized that Russian propaganda, which looked ridiculous from Kiev was extremely effective in the Russian-speaking areas of Ukraine and Russia itself. What we thought was a Revolution of Dignity was presented on Russian TV as an illegal rebellion of neo-Nazis financed and managed by Americans.”


“An anti-criminal revolution was shown as an aggressive offensive on anything that is Russian—culture, language, identity. The technique was simple: Russian media focused on a small radical wing of the revolution—it constituted less than 5%, the rest were young professionals, students, retirees—and blew it out of proportion mixing it with fakes and lies.”

“You would think such a primitive technology wouldn’t work in the 21st century when people have internet,” Sych said. “But it did. No wonder a lot of residents in Crimea and Russia started treating the Ukrainian revolution and Ukrainians themselves with suspicion, to say the least.”

“In a recent poll by the Moscow-based Levada Center polling agency, Russians included what they previously referred to as ‘brotherly Ukraine’ into the top three most hostile nations to Russia, along with the US and Latvia. Ukrainians replaced Georgia and Estonia in this honorary title.”

“Ukrainians’ attitude towards Russians has also deteriorated … The number of Ukrainians willing to live in the same state with Russians fell to a record low of 5% by October last year, even in the East of the country the figure halved from 26% to 13% over just five months.”

“Relations have deteriorated on the human level as well. My wife’s sister lives in Moscow for many years,” Sych said. “She is a Russian citizen. We find it difficult to communicate with her family and decided we should all take a pause. It is difficult to speak with people who are convinced black is white and vice versa.”

“Generally, most Ukrainians have been on a major emotional and financial stretch over the last year,” he added. On the one hand, “many have either participated in the war … or lost a relative or a friend.” On the other, “all have seen their income plummet as the exchange rate of the local currency, the hryvna, fell from 8 to almost 30 to a dollar.”

Today, “Ukraine is now waging two wars: one with pro-Russian rebels and Russian troops in the East, another—at home trying to reform its obsolete economy. The government was slow to reform in the first six months after the revolution. Part of the reason was the war that drew a lot of resources, part was domestic politics—new parliament needed to be elected that would replace the caretaker government with the new one.”

But, Sych continued, everyone has “a strong incentive to reform—a lack of alternative. If [the country doesn’t], Ukraine’s economy will collapse in a year or two. [The reforms] will include privatizing loss-making state companies, cutting red tape and easing the tax burden as well as putting corrupt people in jail.”

“Ukraine has now a historic chance to transform into a vast European nation with competitive economy and rule of law — if it can only survive on the Eastern front—its people have been in emergency mode for the last 15 months.”


Edited by: A. N.

Dear readers! Since you’ ve made it to this point, we have a favor to ask. Russia’s hybrid war against Ukraine is ongoing, but major news agencies have gone away, which is why it's extra important to provide news about Ukraine in English. We are a small independent journalist team on a shoestring budget, have no political or state affiliation, and depend on our readers to keep going (using the chanсe - a big thank you to our generous supporters, we couldn't make it without you.)  If you like what you see, please help keep us online with a donation

Tags: ,


  1. Avatar Rods says:

    Reform seems to be gaining momentum which is good news for Ukraine. There is still much to be done, but it is going in the right direction.

    A bigger concern is what is happening in East Ukraine with the ceasefire fragile at best, but the biggest concern is the continued Russian military buildup of further Russian heavy armour, supplies including ammunition and troop rotation all in breach of Minsk II of course. I suspect that Putin is going to launch a spring offensive, but I think if he does so, he will see that he has gone beyond the patience and goodwill of Western politicians who will provide military assistance including defensive weapons and further sanctions, so Russia pays an ever increasing price for their totally unacceptable, illegal, aggression.

    Glory to Ukraine.

    1. Avatar Murf says:

      I am reminded of an old American south Folk tale of “Brer(Brother) Rabbit and the Tar Baby” (a human manikin made of sticky tar) The Tar is Set up by the Rabbits enemies innocently on the road side. Bere Rabbit comes long and says hey and the unsociable manikin answers with dumb silence. Brer Rabbit gets mad at the Tar Baby and hits it, getting his fist stuck. Getting madder B.R. hits it again, getting his other fist stuck. In a fit of rage B R starts kicking clawing and biting the gooey mess until he has no way of extricating himself.
      Then Brer Rabbits enemies triumphantly make their presence known.
      (Disney turned the transplanted African fable into a rather non PC movie in the 50s)
      Every day the story seems to be to be playing out in real life.
      Can you guess who is standing in for Brer Rabbit in this modern retelling?
      (Hay! Not every thing has to be a Shakespearean tragedy!)

      1. Avatar Murf says:

        Nope I will spell it out as your limited imagination is obscuring your insight.
        Ukraine is the…wait for it… the Tar Baby! See?
        And Berer Rabbit is Putin! Get it!
        And Putin’s hubris is getting him stuck deeper and deeper.
        With me so far?
        The question is how deep will he keep going and who is waiting in the wings to devour him and Russia?
        So is it clear now?
        Next time Symbolism in Grimm’s fairy tails.

  2. Avatar Igor Fazlyev says:

    Another article elsewhere on this website talks about a French book about imperial Russia from 1839. I don’t want to rain your parade people, but remember that in Imperial Russia at one point ALL ministers spoke French, hell Catherine the Great even corresponded with Voltaire – yet it did nothing to improve the living conditions within Russia or dissuade the French speaking Russian elites from their expansionist ambitious. Btw, wasn’t it Catherine the Great that put a bloody end to the first nascent Ukrainian state of Zaporozhskaya Sech?