Copyright © 2021 Euromaidanpress.com

The work of Euromaidan Press is supported by the International Renaissance Foundation

When referencing our materials, please include an active hyperlink to the Euromaidan Press material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. To reprint anything longer, written permission must be acquired from [email protected].

Privacy and Cookie Policies.

Terrorist war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine: Summary for September 15, 2014

Terrorist war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine: Summary for September 15, 2014
Article by: Roman Burko
Translated by: Roman Vlasof and Aksana Dymchenko
Edited by: Larry Field

In spite of the “armistice” the Russian mercenaries continued shelling Donetsk airport over the past 24 hours using heavy artillery. Meanwhile the facility remains under Ukrainian control.

The enemy is also attempting to reach the airport from the north. For this reason they gather forces in Panteleimonivka. An attack from this areas allows them address to issues: their desire to straighten the front line by dislodging the Ukrainian military from Verkhnotoretske, and secondly to get complete control over the Horlivka-Donetsk highway.

For the airport shelling they use heavy guns (artillery) on tracked vehicles that we discussed in an earlier report. According to the preliminary data, over the last day and night the track assembly of one of the large-caliber guns has been removed from operation. The reasons are still being identified, but there is a chance of guerrillas’ action or that the Russian artillery team made a mistake and ran into Ukrainian response shelling. The Russians hide two other large caliber guns in Donetsk residential areas.

In addition large caliber mortar launchers of the type 2S4 “Tyulpan”, were noticed today in one of the Donetsk districts. These mortars are in operational service of the Russian Armed Forces. The large caliber 240-mm mobile mortars 2S4 “Tyulpan” belong to the reserve artillery of Supreme Commander in Chief of RF forces, and are designed to destroy fortified buildings and other tasks, which can not be completed by other types of artillery. The Russian forces smaller caliber artillery which was actively used by DNR militants have proved to be unable to break through the fortification held by the Ukrainian forces. It seems obvious that the “Tyulpans” have been brought in to continue the assault on the airport.

A second issue of significant concern is that these “Tyulpan” mortars are able to shell not only incendiary and guided projectiles, but chemical and neutron shells bearing index “Smola” and “Fata” and can also shoot such nuclear shells as 3B4 and 3B11 having a weight of 2 kt. Of course, using such type of weapons will be immediately recorded by satellite imaging. We are not saying the Russia intends using these types of shells, however such a possibility can never be excluded on the battlefield, especially considering the Kremlin’s growing appetites to test the world community. Recently the Ukrainian Minister of Defense Heletey stated that the RF was threatening to use tactical nuclear weapons against Ukraine.

Let’s remind that DNR terrorists in Donetsk also use an armored train with MRLS ‘Grad’ located on one of its platforms, which operates from the area of the Nitrogen plant and has also been shelling towards the airport. Why the tracks that the train runs on have not been as yet destroyed by ATO artillery or by other means remains a puzzle. Possibly ATO are being over passive with the “armistice”?

At the close of the day on the 15th ATO forces suffered casualties when a military convoy ran into an ambush on the way from Karlovka. Russian militants managed to destroy one Ukrainian armored vehicle.

Militants started offensive actions towards Debaltseve from the South and the East. The grouping of DNR forces that had concentrated in Zuevka was put in motion, as well as forces Bryanka. Let’s note that there is no “boiler” trap (encirclement) around Debaltseve so far, however DNR and their artillery systems work in that direction.

To the South of Donetsk the Russian and DNR maneuvering of their forces continues. It should be noted that according Zello channels, there is growing focus on the area nearby Volnovakha. Considering enemy actions in the area of Olenivka, we can expect further advances towards Mariupol with a purpose to create encirclement in the area of Starohnativka and Novoselivka. However, after the Ukrainian forces rather harshly dealt with the militants and regular armed units from Russia in the area of Shyrokyne, they have become much more cautious. At least, this was stated by people who live in Novoazovsk, who said that militants appear much more scared to advance. Most likely they did not expect such a reaction. This is likely one of the reasons behind the delay of the offense on Mariupol.

The militants in Horlivka continue to build up their forces in the western direction.

In the territory controlled by the terrorists we observe intestine clashes and confrontations with the aim to control cash flow. It is possible that soon we will see development of separatism among separatists themselves, or maybe we will even see “separatism cubed”. Stakhanov has become a pioneer in this scheme of development of small “feudal states”. The Stakhanov militants announced their disaffiliation with the “Luhansk People’s Republic” terrorist organization and proclaimed creation of their own territorial unit of “Cossacks of People’s Guard of Stakhanov”, not recognized by anyone else.

Provided that half-decay rates of the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics remain the same, in the nearest future we will observe “Antratsyt Empire”, “Sverdlovsk Reich” or even “Krasnodon Quasipower”.

Oddly enough, the reason for the lack of unity among the insurgents is the policy of the Russian Federation: replacement of the warlords, direct centralization of control tied to the Kremlin, elimination of undesirable people by the Federal Security Service (FSB). All these things raise concerns of the local “kings” and they have to bite the “hand of the Kremlin” that feeds them (with weapons, ammunition, equipment, supplies). We see the classic principle of a snake that bites its own tail in the action.

Anticipating further developments, it is safe to say that the future escalation of the conflict with the intervention of the third parties is inevitable because the Russian Federation finds itself in the position of a cornered rat and is now forced to take the final shot. In this context, one should pay special attention to attempts of Russian secret services to destabilize the situation in Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia. Orders to sew large parties of Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv People’s Republics symbolics, emergence of agitators promoting separatist ideas and preparing the ground for new “unrecognized republics” — all these facts are alarming and require appropriate measures to be taken.

In this vein, not only the southern, but the Kharkiv direction as well, can serve as a base for the full scale outright invasion. Such development can only be prevented with efficient work of all law enforcement agencies and uniformed services.

The time has come to begin to talk about victories, which are achieved due to smooth interaction between “InformNapalm” volunteers and one of the units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The work of volunteers ans insiders of the team is often fraught with great risks to life and health and this is why we cannot disclose all the nuances. We just say that for the past day 2 armored personnel carriers and 3 guns of militants have been destroyed basing on the information and coordination supplied by our volunteers.

Translated by: Roman Vlasof and Aksana Dymchenko
Edited by: Larry Field
You could close this page. Or you could join our community and help us produce more materials like this.  We keep our reporting open and accessible to everyone because we believe in the power of free information. This is why our small, cost-effective team depends on the support of readers like you to bring deliver timely news, quality analysis, and on-the-ground reports about Russia's war against Ukraine and Ukraine's struggle to build a democratic society. A little bit goes a long way: for as little as the cost of one cup of coffee a month, you can help build bridges between Ukraine and the rest of the world, plus become a co-creator and vote for topics we should cover next. Become a patron or see other ways to support. Become a Patron!

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here

You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Please leave your suggestions or corrections here


    Related Posts

    February 11: The Russian proposal at the Summit in Minsk is unacceptable – president of Ukraine Poroshenko

    U.S., UK, Canada, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa

    February 11 – The Russian proposal at the Summit in Minsk is unacceptable – president of Ukraine Poroshenko. Russia deliberately disrupts agreements.

    February 11 – 19 Ukrainian military were killed and 78 wounded as a result of shelling near the burial mound "Hostra Mogyla" close to Debaltseve and at other locations within ATO area, – informed the spokesman for the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Vladyslav Seleznyov at a briefing on Wednesday morning.

    February 11 – In Donbas pro-Russian militants shelled the positions of Ukrainian troops 27 times on the night of February 11th. Most of the attacks occurred in the direction of Luhansk. 87 pro-Russian militants and 42 units of military equipment were destroyed in the last 24 hours (including 12 tanks, 14 multiple rocket launchers and 16 armored vehicles).

    February 11 – In Donetsk 6 people were killed and 8 wounded as a result of shelling at the bus station and entrance office of "Donetsk Metallurgical Plant".

    February 11 – President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko spoke about a successful military operation at Debaltseve foothold: "Several successful operations were conducted yesterday at Debaltseve foothold. They allowed us to gain control over two municipalities and the contact line", – said Poroshenko.

    February 11 – "People's Republic of Luhansk" and "People's Republic of Donetsk" demand that Ukraine stops the ATO and are requesting autonomy and new elections, – as stated in a protocol draft handed over on Tuesday night by the leaders of the terrorists to the contact group in Minsk.

    February 11 – Russian Federal TV Station "Channel 5" has broadcast a story describing how quickly and easily Russian troops can enter European capitals and threatened the West with missile attacks. Show's authors vaguely disguised this information as campaign to hold "Victory Day parades" in the EU member-states capitals.

    February 11 – Russia implemented a direct military intervention during the battle at the city of Debaltseve, – stated Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, Commander of Allied Land Command (NATO).

    February 11 – Russian Foreign Ministry believes that border control issues should be should negotiated upon with the militants, which, in its turn, doesn't provide a solution to the problem, – stated Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

    February 11 – Government is ready to establish martial law, should there be esalation of the situation in the east. This was stated by President Petro Poroshenko during a government meeting. Poroshenko emphasized that it is precisely "from the results of the summit that it will depend if we will be successful in stopping the aggressor by diplomatic means, or if we will switch into a very different course." I and the government, and Parliament are ready to make a decision to impose martial law in the entire territory of Ukraine," he noted.

    "In no way will I delay this decision, if the the irresponsible acts of the aggressor bring about a serious continued escalation of the conflict," he emphasized. "I am convinced that our country can protect itself and that every person will do whatever posssible in order to demonstrate that victory will be ours. However, I stress, that I am a president of peace, and thatn through army means, the situation in Donbas should not be decided," he added.

    Ukraine cannot be a buffer state

    Photo report from eastern Ukraine

    Help Ukraine seize this chance

    Economist Edward Lucas Attacks Russia's RT and Sputnik for "manufacturing lies" and those working there as "freaks and propagandists"

    Feature by BBC Monitoring on 9 February

    Russian state media have hit back strongly at British journalist Edward Lucas after he criticized them at the recent Munich Security Conference and suggested that journalists working for them should be ostracized. One top TV presenter went as far as to brand Lucas a "village idiot".

    At a panel discussion at the annual Munich Security Conference on 6 February, Lucas, a senior editor at The Economist and author of The New Cold War, accused the Kremlin's international media operations, RT (formerly known as Russia Today) and Sputnik (rebranded successor to the Voice of Russia) of "manufacturing lies".

    He said the people working for them were "freaks and propagandists", who should be the target of a campaign of ostracism, according to records of the discussion published by RT and Russian state news agency RIA Novosti.[1]

    "If anyone puts a CV on my desk and on that CV I see they worked for RT or Sputnik or one of these things, that CV is going into the bin," Lucas said. He added that people in the West were wrong to see working for the Kremlin's international media as a "first stage on the career ladder". "It's not, it's the last stage," he told the Munich conference.

    "Journalistic Joe McCarthy"

    Russian state media came back, all guns blazing, with Lucas even getting a whole slot to himself on state channel Rossiya 1's weekly current affairs news roundup Vesti Nedeli.[2]

    Outspoken host Dmitriy Kiselev, who is also director-general of Sputnik's parent company Rossiya Segodnya (which confusingly translates as Russia Today), hurled a whole fistful of epithets at Lucas – "odious British journalist", "hysterical Londoner" and even "village idiot" – while rubbishing his analysis of Russian politics and accusing The Economist of practising censorship.

    RT responded more primly, saying it was "absolutely outraged" by Lucas's "specious attacks", which, it said, were particularly "despicable" as several of its journalists were daily risking their lives to "report on stories nobody else dares to touch".[3]

    Sputnik also had Lucas in its sights, describing him in one article as a "journalistic Joe McCarthy" – a reference to the US senator who instigated a witch-hunt against Communist sympathizers in the 1950s.[4]

    Lucas himself appeared to revel in the backlash, responding to Kiselev in kind.

    "Better than a Pulitzer prize? i get prime-time abuse from vile Kremlin mouthpiece Kiselov," he tweeted.[5]

    He could also take comfort from the support of fellow Twitterati, who suggested he had got under RT's skin.

    US journalist Michael Weiss observed that Lucas had "figured out RT hacks' Achilles heel", while Times columnist Oliver Kamm said he had "badly wounded them".[6][7]

    Writer and Russia watcher Ben Judah also weighed in, saying Lucas had put the wind up RT. "Experts should refuse to appear on RT – or any other? disinformation channel", he added.[8]

    "Misinformation"

    RT and its supporters also entered the fray on Twitter.

    One of its contributors, Robert Bridge, accused Lucas of being "scared to hear another side of the story", while the channel itself suggested his attack on its journalists may have been provoked by recent criticism of The Economist on its show In The Now.[9][10]

    In The Now dismissed as "absurd" a claim by The Economist that Russian state TV "conceals" bad economic news from its viewers. It showed excerpts from top TV bulletins talking about the collapse of the rouble to prove the contrary. It also said that the story of the rouble's woes and the looming recession had been well covered in Russian newspapers. To suggest otherwise, it said, was to promote "misinformation".[11]

    It called its analysis of The Economist's coverage a "tutorial on how to write a propaganda article".

    But RT's criticism of The Economist was itself guilty of omission and distortion.

    For example, it made no mention of the fact that on the day in mid December when the rouble tumbled by some 10 per cent, Rossiya 1 main news had ignored this story altogether.

    Also, it illustrated its claim about the Russian press's economic coverage with screenshots not from leading newspapers but from news agencies and websites, one of them a little known business portal from the Volga republic of Tatarstan.

    The panel discussion at the Munich conference, which also featured NATO commander and US general Philip Breedlove and Norwegian Defence Minister Ine Eriksen Soreide, looked more broadly at the issue of hybrid warfare and the role played in it by different media organizations.

    According to a report by Judy Dempsey on the Carnegie Europe website, the participants said that one of the reasons why RT and its ilk have been able to make such an impact is the cutbacks at top Western international media, such as the BBC World Service and the Voice of America.[12]

    [1] http://rt.com/op-edge/230315-rt-responds-lucas-munich/

    [2] http://vesti7.ru/news?id=45745

    [3] See note 1

    [4] http://sputniknews.com/columnists/20150208/1017973545.html

    [5] https://twitter.com/edwardlucas/status/564531479263600642

    [6] https://twitter.com/michaeldweiss/status/564468359048486912

    [7] https://twitter.com/OliverKamm/status/564408994853572609

    [8] https://twitter.com/b_judah/status/564541740863193091

    [9] https://twitter.com/Robert_Bridge/status/564665181549391873

    [10] https://twitter.com/INTHENOWRT/status/564758039371472896

    [11] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2H5X3WYm_3U

    [12] http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=58998

    Source: BBC Monitoring research 9 Feb 15

    P.S.: Please spread this appeal as much as possible.